Re: [sidr] rsaEncryption vs sha256WithRSAEncryption in RPKI certificates

2019-06-28 Thread Alberto Leiva
Oh, never mind. Both sections include "BGPsec Router Certificates." *scraches head* I don't know what's happening. On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:20 PM Alberto Leiva wrote: > > I think those particular sections of RFCs 7935 and 8608 are talking > about different documents: > > 3. Asymmetric Key Pair

Re: [sidr] rsaEncryption vs sha256WithRSAEncryption in RPKI certificates

2019-06-28 Thread Alberto Leiva
I think those particular sections of RFCs 7935 and 8608 are talking about different documents: 3. Asymmetric Key Pair Formats The key formats used to compute signatures on CA certificates, BGPsec Router Certificates, and CRLs are as specified in Section 3 of [RFC7935]. This section

Re: [sidr] rsaEncryption vs sha256WithRSAEncryption in RPKI certificates

2019-06-28 Thread Alvaro Retana
[Adding sidrops.] Hi! I was just looking at this report… https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7935 The report says: "All existing RPKI readers and writers that I've seen, as well as the global RPKI repository certificates themselves, currently use rsaEncryption as the public key

Re: [sidr] rsaEncryption vs sha256WithRSAEncryption in RPKI certificates

2019-05-23 Thread Alberto Leiva
I see. Is this erratum-worthy? On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:23 AM Russ Housley wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 2019, at 6:18 PM, Alberto Leiva wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > Another question. > > > > RFC 7935 states the following: > > > > 3.1. Public Key Format > > > > (...) > > > > algorithm