Just in case there are people who do not know, Tim’s position has changed, the
t...@ripe.net address is bouncing, and he has appeared in ietf mail lately as
t...@nlnetlabs.nl.
So if you reply to my message or any of the RFC Errata System
messages, you might want to replace the
t...@ripe.net
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8360,
"Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5638
--
Status:
I’d be interested to hear from the implementer(s) of the
validation-reconsidered RFC what impact there is in handling this change.
(I suspect little impact, if any, but it would be very good to hear it from the
implementer(s). Suspicions don’t count for much.)
—Sandy
> On Feb 13, 2019, at
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
"Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5638
--
Type:
seems legit to me.
At Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:33:35 -0800 (PST),
RFC Errata System wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
> "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
>
> --
> You may review the report
