Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-rogaglia-sidr-multiple-publication-points

I support adoption of this document, the discussion of which is going to make a better RPKI deployment. Di Ma China Internet Network Information Center （CNNIC） 在 2013-3-12，下午1:54，Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@sparta.com 写道： The authors of draft-rogaglia-sidr-multiple-publication-points have

Re: [sidr] suggested text to replace Section 4 in the use cases doc

level. We cannot assume that the country operates an NIR. INR management in a country with NIR could be very complicated, with different operation models. If necessay , a separate operation doc might be presented, getting NIR stuff involved. Di Ma Internet Domain Name System Beijing

Re: [sidr] suggested text to replace Section 4 in the use cases doc

NIR stuff involved. Di Ma Internet Domain Name System Beijing Engineering Research Centre (ZDNS) KNET Technologies Thanks for the feedback. My point, in case 1, is that we cannot assume that a solution to this use case can rely on the existence of an NIR. That is compatible

Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying - finishes - 10/16/2017 - Oct 16, 2017

I think this document is ready to go through IESG review. Ship it. Di > 在 2017年10月6日，02:36，Sean Turner 写道： > > Always happy to see the “ship it” response to a WGLC :) > > Note that we weren’t restrictive on purpose. There’s a whole bunch of ways > how the CSR could get

Re: [sidr] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:02 AM Di Ma <m...@zdns.cn> wrote: > Warren, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Please see my responses in lines. > > > 在 2018年4月2日，05:02，Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> 写道： > > > > Warren Kumari has ente

Re: [sidr] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam, The version -08 of SLURM draft has just been submitted after we authors exchanged notes on JSON work in this document. In addition to some editorial changes based on other ADs’ suggestion, we authors mainly improved the description of the specifications of the SLURM file with JSON

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04

Sriram, Thanks again for your comments. > 在 2018年1月30日，04:36，Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) > 写道： > > David, Di, Tim: > > These are minor comments in alignment with Alvaro’s. > > Alvaro wrote: > >> M4. References: > >> M4.1.

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04

Hi, Alvaro, Thanks for your comments. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年1月30日，02:21，Alvaro Retana 写道： > > Dear authors: > > I just finished reading this document. > > I have some comments (below) that should be easy to address — please take a > look. I

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04

Sriram, Thanks for your comments. We authors will update the draft, in response to your suggestions and comments from the AD. Di > 在 2018年1月30日，04:36，Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) > 写道： > > David, Di, Tim: > > These are minor comments in alignment with

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04

Hi, Alvaro, Thanks. A new version (-06) has been submitted. Di > 在 2018年2月7日，01:48，Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> 写道： > > On February 5, 2018 at 10:09:18 PM, Di Ma (m...@zdns.cn) wrote: > > Di: > > Hi! > >> A new version (-05) has been submitted

Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年3月31日，01:54，Benjamin Kaduk 写道： > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Ben, Thanks for reminding us:-) Di > 在 2018年4月10日，02:28，Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> 写道： > > > >> On Apr 6, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF >> <spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, Di, >> >> On Fri, A

Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Spencer, Thanks for your explanation. Di > 在 2018年4月6日，23:06，Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hi, Di, > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma <m...@zdns.cn> wrote: > Alissa, > > Thanks very much for your comments. >

Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Alexey, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see authors' responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月2日，18:47，Alexey Melnikov 写道： > > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the

Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Ben, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see authors' responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月4日，03:43，Ben Campbell 写道： > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Warren, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月2日，05:02，Warren Kumari 写道： > > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact

Re: [sidr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Eric, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see authors' responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月3日，00:56，Eric Rescorla 写道： > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Alissa, Thanks very much for your comments. Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? Di > 在 2018年4月5日，02:00，Alissa Cooper 写道： > > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep

Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

or multiple recipients > within a single administrative domain (that may span multiple ASNs > and FQDNs)? Di Ma RPSTIR https://bgpsecurity.net > 在 2018年3月31日，01:54，Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> 写道： > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > dr

Re: [sidr] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06

IJsbrand, Thanks for your review. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年2月27日，17:18，IJsbrand Wijnands 写道： > > Hello, > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The > Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related

Re: [sidr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06

Daniel, Thanks for your review. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年2月20日，23:00，Daniel Migault 写道： > > Reviewer: Daniel Migault > Review result: Has Nits > > Hi, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort

Re: [sidr] [Sidrops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080)

I have got no objection to this erratum as the co author of RFC8416. Thanks go to Ben for catching this. And this update will not affect RPSTIR2 as we check it. Anyway, I think this discussion will help to update SLURM in support of ASPA in next version as Tim mentioned. Di > 2022年8月22日