Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:15:28PM +0800, Di Ma wrote: > Benjamin, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Please see my responses in lines. > > > > 在 2018年3月31日,01:54,Benjamin Kaduk 写道: > > [trimming lots of stuff that looks good] > > I also wonder if we would benefit

Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Benjamin, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年3月31日,01:54,Benjamin Kaduk 写道: > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-02 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Di, Thank you for the extra clarification. I think that my question is basically the same as in Warren's DISCUSS, so perhaps we should let this thread stop and just have the discussion on that thread. Having said that, I think my question was more about the case when there were two differet

Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-30 Thread Di Ma
Benjamin, Thanks very much for your comments. I will exchange notes with co-authors on your editorial suggestions. Yet as for your question about slurmTarget, here is the explanation. First of all, the FQDN is used by the SLURM file distributor to determine which RP will use this slurm file,