[sig-policy] Re: End of final comment period for prop-156: Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

2024-05-20 Thread Bertrand Cherrier via SIG-policy
Hi Fernando, Sorry we're in a bit of a civil war here, I'll get back to you asap. Regards, Sam 18 mai 2024, à 02:51, Fernando Frediani a écrit : > Hello Bertrand > > > Since the question was directed to you, you cannot expected a policy author > to answer on your behalf. I was question your

[sig-policy] Re: End of final comment period for prop-156: Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

2024-05-18 Thread Christopher Hawker
Hello Fernando, Since the question was directed to you, you cannot expected a policy author to answer on your behalf. Bertrand did not expect me to answer on his behalf. As he stated, the answer I gave to your question was correct, and he believed there was no reason to repeat what I had

[sig-policy] Re: End of final comment period for prop-156: Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

2024-05-17 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hello Bertrand Since the question was directed to you, you cannot expected a policy author to answer on your behalf. I was question your decision to give consensus to such a controversial proposal that has had zero support from community. Sometimes on these forums I get in doubt if the Chairs

[sig-policy] Re: End of final comment period for prop-156: Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

2024-05-05 Thread Bertrand Cherrier via SIG-policy
Hello Fernando, I didn't ignore you, sorry if that's how you felt, please accept my apologies. Christopher did gave you the correct answer, so I figured that saying again the same thing would be useless, my bad ! Gaging consensus is not an easy task, we start with the mailing list, most of the

[sig-policy] Re: End of final comment period for prop-156: Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

2024-05-02 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hello Bertrand It seems that you completely ignored this discussion recently and didn't answer questions that were put specifically to you. On 06th March it was asked what was taken into consideration in order give consensus on this proposal and you never replied. It was put and reviewed all