[Slackbuilds-users] rc.postfix

2013-02-20 Thread Eugen Wissner
Hi, rc.6 which is executed during shutdown/reboot sets PATH=/sbin:/etc:/bin:/usr/bin. If I want to stop postfix automatically in rc.6 or rc.local_shutdown I get an error postfix can't be found because postfix is in /usr/sbin. Wouldn't it be better to write the full path in rc.postfix:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] rc.postfix

2013-02-20 Thread Nishant Limbachia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/2013 04:41 AM, Eugen Wissner wrote: Hi, rc.6 which is executed during shutdown/reboot sets PATH=/sbin:/etc:/bin:/usr/bin. If I want to stop postfix automatically in rc.6 or rc.local_shutdown I get an error postfix can't be found because

[Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Doogster
The unrar SlackBuild should be discontinued. The current release of rar/unrar, the one you get from rarsoft's homepage, is 4.2.4. The current unrar SlackBuild builds 4.0.7, which is ridiculously ancient. I contacted the maintainer months ago and never got a response. We have a corresponding

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Bojan Popovic
@Matteo: Is libunrar built along with unrar? Or if not, does there exist an option to do so? If yes, that sounds sensible. I guess you are also suggesting to take over unrar (as you are the maintainer of libunrar)? If yes, I think that would be a good idea. Bojan.

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Bojan Popovic
I misread the name of the libunrar maintainer. Sorry Mario and Matteo for the confusion. Anyway, I support Matteo's idea. Bojan. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Bojan Popovic
Hi, The unrar SlackBuild should be discontinued. Sorry, I don't agree. One important difference between rar and unrar is in their license terms. For example, unrar license states something like this: 3. The UnRAR utility may be freely distributed. It is allowed to distribute UnRAR

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Noel Butler
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 21:35 +0100, Bojan Popovic wrote: There is a big difference in re-distributability of the resulting packages. So separate unrar is a sensible option. Agreed. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Mario
On 02/20/2013 09:46 PM, Bojan Popovic wrote: @Matteo: Is libunrar built along with unrar? Or if not, does there exist an option to do so? If yes, that sounds sensible. I guess you are also suggesting to take over unrar (as you are the maintainer of libunrar)? If yes, I think that would be a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread JB
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:35:24 +0100 Bojan Popovic bo...@mycity.rs wrote: Hi, The unrar SlackBuild should be discontinued. Sorry, I don't agree. snip I'm using a bunch of archivers/unarchivers on my machines and basically depend on any of them a lot. +1 I recommend

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Larry Hajali
I don't use the rar package so I won't comment on that but I do like Mateo's idea of combining unrar/libunrar packages. --Larry On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:10 PM, JB yocha...@lavabit.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:35:24 +0100 Bojan Popovic bo...@mycity.rs wrote: Hi, The unrar

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Robby Workman
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:51:39 +0100 Mario ma...@slackverse.org wrote: On 02/20/2013 09:46 PM, Bojan Popovic wrote: @Matteo: Is libunrar built along with unrar? Or if not, does there exist an option to do so? If yes, that sounds sensible. I guess you are also suggesting to take over unrar

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] unrar should be discontinued

2013-02-20 Thread Ivan Zaigralin
I'd be very happy with that scenario. I prefer to have separate slackbuilds for free parts of non-free programs, as anyone conscious about security should. On 02/20/2013 08:23 PM, Robby Workman wrote: ... it seems to me that the right way to do it would be to keep the unrar name, make it