Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread Heinz Wiesinger
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 20:06:13 Christoph Willing wrote: On 26/05/15 17:24, Christoph Willing wrote: Hi Heinz, Since you're updating the SlackBuild, I wonder if you would consider a change to the way optional features are handled? Unlike many other softwares, ffmpeg is quite good at

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread Miguel De Anda
is it an option to have it autodetect if each of those libraries are installed? On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:12 PM, B Watson yalh...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/28/15, Heinz Wiesinger ppr...@liwjatan.at wrote: Leaving everything at no is the only sensible choice I'm afraid. How about adding a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread David Spencer
I pushed a different fix for this to github which should take care of it properly. Heh, that's much better! I wondered if that would work but never tried it!! derp Thanks -D. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread Heinz Wiesinger
On Thursday 28 May 2015 17:53:47 David Spencer wrote: Hey folks, Everything on the list is now building ok on 14.1 here, both x86_64 and i686, but -current needs more work. The problems were fixed as follows: [..] multimedia/transcode -- needs lame in REQUIRES I pushed a different fix

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Heinz Wiesinger
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:56:55 Klaatu wrote: Fellow SBo maintainers: I have noticed that one of my own scripts depends on JACK, and that I myself had listed the dependency as jack-audio-connection-kit. Then I realised that this listing is not quite correct, because in fact ANY package

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread Heinz Wiesinger
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 03:51:44 B Watson wrote: Another thing about building ffmpeg: it uses texi2html to generate the developer documentation, and chokes if it can't find it in the $PATH (usually because the user did plain 'su' instead of 'su -', or because the T series isn't installed).

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread B Watson
On 5/28/15, Heinz Wiesinger ppr...@liwjatan.at wrote: Leaving everything at no is the only sensible choice I'm afraid. How about adding a copy/pastable line to bottom of the README with all the environment variables set to yes? Something like: ---cut--- To build with all optional dependencies,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread B Watson
On 5/28/15, Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com wrote: 1. list both jack;audio-connection-kit and jack2 in the README file if your package requires JACK Kinda annoying if neither one is in REQUIRES in the .info file, it would break sbotools or sqg's queue building. 2. re-structure the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Marcel Saegebarth
On 05/28/2015 06:56 AM, Klaatu wrote: 1. list both jack;audio-connection-kit and jack2 in the README file if your package requires JACK or... 2. re-structure the jack-audio-connection-kit and jack2 scripts such that they become one and the same script, by which the user can choose to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Klaatu
On 05/28/2015 08:14 PM, David Spencer wrote: 2. re-structure the jack-audio-connection-kit and jack2 scripts such that they become one and the same script, by which the user can choose to build either jack1 or jack2, depending on their requirements. What would be in DOWNLOAD= and VERSION=?

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Klaatu
IMHO I don't see a reason to merge both into one SlackBuild. I would say that JACK users are well aware that two versions exist and this is also a decision from the upstream maintainers and those who don't use JACK won't use it as it is may just a hard dependency from the maintainer. Also,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Klaatu
On 05/28/2015 06:54 PM, B Watson wrote: On 5/28/15, Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com wrote: 1. list both jack;audio-connection-kit and jack2 in the README file if your package requires JACK Kinda annoying if neither one is in REQUIRES in the .info file, it would break sbotools or sqg's

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
I think in the future, I'll use %README% in REQUIRES to alert the user that the version of JACK is optional. %README% is used to tell users that a package is conflicting/replacing Slackware packages. Other than that, users are always assumed to read README. -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody want xapian-omega and yad?

2015-05-28 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2015-05-28 9:27 GMT+02:00 Charles char...@charlesmatkinson.org: With regret, voluntary work as a Debian and (cough) Ubuntu sysadmin leaves me no time to update the xapian-omega and yad SlackBuilds :( I'll take yad, if nobody want it *badly* Matteo

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Brad Ely
On Thu, 28 May 2015 22:05:51 +1200 Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com wrote: On 05/28/2015 08:14 PM, David Spencer wrote: 2. re-structure the jack-audio-connection-kit and jack2 scripts such that they become one and the same script, by which the user can choose to build either jack1 or

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread David Spencer
Just thinking out loud... You could have the separate scripts for jack1 and jack2 with their associated .info files set up as dependencies of a jack-common (or whatever) build script which requires an argument to select the version desired. Perhaps build information could be passed via

[Slackbuilds-users] README [fork of Re: jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2]

2015-05-28 Thread Klaatu
On 05/29/2015 12:20 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: I think in the future, I'll use %README% in REQUIRES to alert the user that the version of JACK is optional. %README% is used to tell users that a package is conflicting/replacing Slackware packages. Other than that, users are always

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Klaatu
On 05/29/2015 12:20 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: I think in the future, I'll use %README% in REQUIRES to alert the user that the version of JACK is optional. %README% is used to tell users that a package is conflicting/replacing Slackware packages. Other than that, users are always

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread JK Wood
On May 28, 2015 9:03 AM, Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com wrote: On 05/29/2015 12:20 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: I think in the future, I'll use %README% in REQUIRES to alert the user that the version of JACK is optional. %README% is used to tell users that a package is

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] README [fork of Re: jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2]

2015-05-28 Thread Heinz Wiesinger
On Friday 29 May 2015 01:55:44 Klaatu wrote: On 05/29/2015 12:20 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: I think in the future, I'll use %README% in REQUIRES to alert the user that the version of JACK is optional. %README% is used to tell users that a package is conflicting/replacing

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jack-audio-connection-kit vs jack2

2015-05-28 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
Is there currently a way to indicate that two packages are able to satisfy one dependency? I can't even think of an SBo precedence to base a resolution upon. I would suggest put one of them as default dependency and list the other one in README. That's what i did with your aj-snapshot

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2015-05-26 16:56 GMT+02:00 Willy Sudiarto Raharjo will...@slackbuilds.org: Thanks, but what about the problem where it breaks the permissions on /tmp? morticia# ls -ald /tmp/ drwxrwxrwt 25 root root 20480 May 26 15:23 /tmp/ here on my VM it gave different results ls -l /tmp drwx-- 2

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread David Spencer
Hey folks, Everything on the list is now building ok on 14.1 here, both x86_64 and i686, but -current needs more work. The problems were fixed as follows: audio/audacity -- fixed with John V's patch audio/mpd -- fixed with John V's upversion games/alephone -- fixed with John V's patch on 14.1

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FFmpeg update

2015-05-28 Thread David Spencer
sorry willy, I think David was referring to the permission of the /tmp directory itself: from what I have understood it seem to overwrite the normal permissions of 1777 with 0755... Thanks Matteo, Willy and me sorted it out already, sorry for not keeping the list up-to-date, but it was a bit