Re: [Slackbuilds-users] libtorrent-rasterbar-legacy and libtorrent-rasterbar

2020-06-01 Thread Donald Cooley
I don't understand the question. qBittorrent-4.2.5 for which I am creating an update recommends libtorrent-rasterbar-1.2.x branch. There is tribler and an older version of qbittorrent that builds with qt4 that need the 1.1.x branch. On 6/1/20 10:52 PM, Ska Endo wrote: > I am actually using the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] libtorrent-rasterbar-legacy and libtorrent-rasterbar

2020-06-01 Thread Ska Endo
I am actually using the libtorrent 1.2.x branch on Slackware-current with qBittorrent, so is this just a wait for it moment on upgrading libtorrent-rasterbar until 15 releases or is there something that specifically needs the 1.2 branch?     Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 at 8:56 PM From: "Donald

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] libtorrent-rasterbar-legacy and libtorrent-rasterbar

2020-06-01 Thread B Watson
On 6/1/20, Donald Cooley wrote: > and Tribler would change their dependency from > libtorrent-rasterbar to libtorrent-rasterbar-legacy. I'll change the dep for tribler... but tribler is crap. I've tried to give it away on the list, nobody seems to want it, and I have yet to successfully

[Slackbuilds-users] libtorrent-rasterbar-legacy and libtorrent-rasterbar

2020-06-01 Thread Donald Cooley
There are a few SlackBuilds that depend on the older 1.1 branch of libtorrent-rasterbar: qBittorrent, miro, and tribler. Meanwhile there is a 1.2 branch that has been around on GitHub for some time and there is also a release candidate for a 2.* branch of libtorrent-rasterbar. I've prepared a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread Jeremy Hansen
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, 11:54 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Klaatu wrote: > > > When I use a .deb file as source, it's usually because the latest RPM is > > Fedora and requires a very recent libc or libc++ (or similar) that my > > Slackware box doesn't have by default. The .deb

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] slackbuilds orphaned

2020-06-01 Thread Franzen
as mentioned on the list: I have updated the openTTD Slackbuild, feel free to use it :) Thanks, you may take over th build if you like, i'm very busy currently and that may not change soon. Johannes ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, B Watson wrote: Maybe because converting a .deb to a .tgz is just about a one-liner in shell script? It used to just be: B, That's a good reason. I've not had a reason to look for a conversion method and assumed that both took equivalent effort to convert. Another

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Klaatu wrote: When I use a .deb file as source, it's usually because the latest RPM is Fedora and requires a very recent libc or libc++ (or similar) that my Slackware box doesn't have by default. The .deb packages I find seem to be more conservative, whether for Debian or

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread B Watson
On 6/1/20, Rich Shepard wrote: > I'm curious because core slackware provides a great utility, rpm2tgz, but > not one for .deb packages. Yet, a number of SBo packages download a .deb > and > convert it to .tgz for installation. Why the difference(s)? Maybe because converting a .deb to a .tgz is

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread JK Wood
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, 12:42 Klaatu wrote: > On Monday, June 01, 2020 08:11:43 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > > I'm curious because core slackware provides a great utility, rpm2tgz, but > > not one for .deb packages. Yet, a number of SBo packages download a .deb > and > > convert it to .tgz for

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread Klaatu
On Monday, June 01, 2020 08:11:43 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > I'm curious because core slackware provides a great utility, rpm2tgz, but > not one for .deb packages. Yet, a number of SBo packages download a .deb and > convert it to .tgz for installation. Why the difference(s)? > > Regards, > > Rich

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] slackbuilds orphaned

2020-06-01 Thread Heiko Rosemann
Hello Johannes, as mentioned on the list: I have updated the openTTD Slackbuild, feel free to use it :) Heiko On 1/28/20 11:06 AM, Franzen wrote: >> games/openttd > > I'll take this. > > Johannes > ___ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list >

[Slackbuilds-users] [Slackbuilds] OpenTTD update

2020-06-01 Thread Heiko Rosemann
Hello Daniel, I'm reinstalling my machine and noticed the openTTD source is no longer available. While I was having a go at it, I also updated the Slackbuild for the latest version. Feel free to use it, I currently can't test on 14.2 but it runs on current. Heiko -- eMails verschlüsseln mit

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: >> we are a bit late on this update, > > Looks like some tar.gz files are not rebuilt for this update, so sbopkg > finds packages to update, but builds old versions :-( > For example openconnect, mosquitto, kicad-*. > But zoom-linux is fine.

[Slackbuilds-users] Converting other packages to .tgz

2020-06-01 Thread Rich Shepard
I'm curious because core slackware provides a great utility, rpm2tgz, but not one for .deb packages. Yet, a number of SBo packages download a .deb and convert it to .tgz for installation. Why the difference(s)? Regards, Rich ___ SlackBuilds-users

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread MyRequiem
Re: Alexander Verbovetsky 01.06.2020 >On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, at 17:00, MyRequiem wrote: >> I think, this a problem with the SBo updates. I not use sbopkg. >> Example: >> transmission package, current version 3.00 >> If download with wget: >> >> $ wget

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, at 17:00, MyRequiem wrote: > I think, this a problem with the SBo updates. I not use sbopkg. > Example: > transmission package, current version 3.00 > If download with wget: > > $ wget http://slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/14.2/network/transmission.tar.gz > > unpack this and

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread Marek Wodzinski
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Christoph Willing wrote: On 1/6/20 10:03 pm, Marek Wodzinski wrote: Hello, On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: we are a bit late on this update, Looks like some tar.gz files are not rebuilt for this update, so sbopkg finds packages to update, but builds

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread MyRequiem
Re: Christoph Willing 01.06.2020 <61865c41-f138-b093-66ea-c0f86b5c2...@linux.com> >On 1/6/20 10:03 pm, Marek Wodzinski wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: >>> we are a bit late on this update, >> >> Looks like some tar.gz files are not rebuilt for this

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread Christoph Willing
On 1/6/20 10:03 pm, Marek Wodzinski wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: >> we are a bit late on this update, > > Looks like some tar.gz files are not rebuilt for this update, so sbopkg > finds packages to update, but builds old versions :-( > For example

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread MyRequiem
Re: Marek Wodzinski 01.06.2020 >Hello, > >On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: >> we are a bit late on this update, > >Looks like some tar.gz files are not rebuilt for this update, so sbopkg finds >packages to update, but builds old versions :-( >For example openconnect, mosquitto,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

2020-06-01 Thread Marek Wodzinski
Hello, On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: we are a bit late on this update, Looks like some tar.gz files are not rebuilt for this update, so sbopkg finds packages to update, but builds old versions :-( For example openconnect, mosquitto, kicad-*. But zoom-linux is fine.