Re: [Slackbuilds-users] COMPAT32 question

2015-01-03 Thread Larry Hajali
Has this been signed off by the SBo admins? I see that apulse now has the [ -e /lib/libc.so.6 ] COMPAT32=${COMPAT32:-yes} check in the ready queue. --Larry On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, B Watson yalh...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/17/14, Ryan P.C. McQuen rya...@linux.com wrote: Furthermore,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] COMPAT32 question

2015-01-03 Thread Ryan P.C. McQuen
ryanpcmcquen.com On Jan 3, 2015 4:32 PM, Larry Hajali larryh...@gmail.com wrote: Has this been signed off by the SBo admins? I see that apulse now has the [ -e /lib/libc.so.6 ] COMPAT32=${COMPAT32:-yes} check in the ready queue. Actually it has been live on SBo since 12.20:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] COMPAT32 question

2015-01-03 Thread Larry Hajali
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Ryan P.C. McQuen rya...@linux.com wrote: ryanpcmcquen.com On Jan 3, 2015 4:32 PM, Larry Hajali larryh...@gmail.com wrote: Has this been signed off by the SBo admins? I see that apulse now has the [ -e /lib/libc.so.6 ] COMPAT32=${COMPAT32:-yes} check in the

[Slackbuilds-users] COMPAT32 question

2014-12-17 Thread Ryan P.C. McQuen
I maintain apulse, which has a COMPAT32=yes switch. I'm wondering how everyone feels about putting a check for compat32 into the SlackBuild, and the best way to do that. I was thinking something like this: if [ ! -z '$( find /var/log/packages/ -name *compat32* -print )' ]; then export

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] COMPAT32 question

2014-12-17 Thread B Watson
On 12/17/14, Ryan P.C. McQuen rya...@linux.com wrote: Furthermore, does someone know a better way to perform this check. Maybe I should be relying on checking glibc or gcc ... That's what I'd do. In the section that checks ARCH: ... elif [ $ARCH = x86_64 ]; then SLKCFLAGS=-O2 -fPIC