On 9/17/2023 8:09 AM, Shawn Heisey via slf4j-user wrote:
> On 9/16/2023 3:36 PM, Ceki Gülcü via slf4j-user wrote:
>>> I have learned that although Solr does include the jul-to-slf4j
>>> jar, this bridge does not get activated just by having the jar in
>>> the cl
Hi Shawn,
Comments below.
On 9/16/2023 10:45 PM, Shawn Heisey via slf4j-user wrote:
[cut]
> I have learned that although Solr does include the jul-to-slf4j
> jar, this bridge does not get activated just by having the jar in
> the classpath. It must be activated either in the code or in the
>
Hello All,
I am very pleased to announce the release of SLF4J version 2.0.9.
It is now possible to specify the provider class explicitly via the
"slf4j.provider" system property, yielding full control of provider
loading to the end-user. Moreover, the "slf4j.provider" system
property bypasses
Hello Richard,
Due to lack of use, the slf4j-jcl module was removed with no replacement
in SLF4J version 2.0.
Best regards,
--
Ceki Gülcü
Sponsoring SLF4J/logback/reload4j at https://github.com/sponsors/qos-ch
On 6/30/2023 6:31 PM, User list for the slf4j project via slf4j-user wrote:
> Is
