On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, [iso-8859-1] Bernhard Lüder wrote:
Or alternatively you can use CDMA
except the data kit costs you a arm and a leg for a pissy bit of cable and
a useless cd which I haven't used yet.
(After battling with the sales staff because it only says windoze on the
box! - when in
Or alternatively you can use CDMA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Fitch
Sent: Thursday, 29 June 2000 15:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] mobile internet!
DaZZa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From slashdot...
Blackbox writes
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_L=FCder?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or alternatively you can use CDMA
why? are you suggesting they don't drop out?
cos mine does! (it's better than GSM but not as good
as the marketing would have you believe).
or are you referring to the supposedly much faster
data rate
why? are you suggesting they don't drop out?
cos mine does! (it's better than GSM but not as good
as the marketing would have you believe).
As far as voice goes it works way better outdoors than indoors, whereas
gsm seems to do quite ok indoors. But it's comparing oranges and apples
I
From slashdot...
Blackbox writes "This site answers the age old question: "What do you get
when you run 16 mobile phones in parallel?" The answer is of course a 150
kbit/s connection to the internet for your car! Check it out at:
http://www.megacar.com shows you the details.
Wow! I want one!
DaZZa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From slashdot...
Blackbox writes "This site answers the age old question: "What do you get
when you run 16 mobile phones in parallel?" The answer is of course a 150
kbit/s connection to the internet for your car! Check it out at:
http://www.megacar.com shows you
