Re: filesystem layout (was Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes)

2000-06-30 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:54:02AM +1000, Dave Fitch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Matthew Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: [snip] log files etc rotate these days rather than continually growing. I just have root and swap most of the time (sometimes /opt as well) except

Re: filesystem layout (was Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes)

2000-06-30 Thread Dave Fitch
Jobst Schmalenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am sorry but you missed the point, logfiles get swapped by logrotate and that doesnt happen every 5 minutes. If you have only ONE partition and you get SYM attacked with IPCHAINS logging the attack, you will NOT be able to log in (or some other kind of

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread craig
9671 94% / Craig - Original Message - From: Andrew Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Terry Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 7:52 AM Subject: Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Terry Collins wrote: Does anyone know

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread Terry Collins
Erich Schulz wrote: My web server at home is 33Meg Dx, works just fine on my US robotics 56K modem: I prefer the Banksia (MyFastModem V34 model) modems to the USR modem. I found the US Roboticsa will give the highest speed peaks, but wasn't as reliable (more redials), whereas the Banksia

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 05:58:44PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I have RH6 running on a old 486 DX 66 8meg Ram with a 200 meg HDD , it have apache and ftp working , mainly i use it as a gateway / firewall I think it has a 25 meg swap , but no NFS Filesystem

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread Matthew Dalton
Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 178533159643 9671 94% / You shouldnt have it all on one filesystem though, cause if the logs fill up (syn attach etc) you can log on anymore, instead do

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread craig
Subject: Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 05:58:44PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I have RH6 running on a old 486 DX 66 8meg Ram with a 200 meg HDD , it have apache and ftp working , mainly i use it as a gateway / firewall I think it has a 25 meg swap

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:38:23AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yes true but terry was just asking about thinning down a distro , and it was put together last weekend very quickly and all i could find was a small hard drive .. and you did very well (incl apache

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:16:48AM +1000, Matthew Dalton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 178533159643 9671 94% / You shouldnt have it all on one filesystem

filesystem layout (was Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes)

2000-06-29 Thread Dave Fitch
Matthew Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 178533159643 9671 94% / You shouldnt have it all on one filesystem though, cause if the logs fill up (syn attach etc)

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-29 Thread Jason Nicholls
G'day, On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 11:24:06AM +1000, James Wilkinson wrote: Horrible. I had an old 486DX2/66 with 16M RAM and a 500M disk acting as a masqerading proxy, from 10Mbit to a 56k modem. I never worked out what the bottleneck was, but you'd be lucky to get more than 0.5KB/s from it.

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-28 Thread Danny Yee
Padmini Naidu wrote: [jo@sensi]$ uptime 11:40am up 600 days, 21:28, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Heh, that beats mine : www:~; uptime 8:30pm up 443 days, 6:19, 2 users, load average: 0.15, 0.03, 0.01 But this machine has been in continuous operation as a web server for

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-28 Thread Terry Collins
Danny Yee wrote: .snip. But this machine has been in continuous operation as a web server for all that time, serving up to ten thousand requests a day - and it's also a 66Mhz 486 with 16MB of memory! Blow this, I've had enough. I'm retiring the pentium 100 with 64Mb of ram at

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-28 Thread Scott Howard
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 08:50:11PM +1000, Terry Collins wrote: Does anyone know of a linux distro that will provide an apache server and nfs and fit onto 500Mb of hard disk (swap included)? {:-^). MCC or SLS should do this fine (You do remember MCC and SLS, dont you?? :) Scott. -- SLUG -

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-28 Thread Herbert Xu
Terry Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of a linux distro that will provide an apache server and nfs and fit onto 500Mb of hard disk (swap included)? {:-^). Surely any distribution will do, provided that your web pages can fit into that space. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out!

RE: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-28 Thread Jill Rowling
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 10:41 PM To: George Vieira Cc: Mail List - SLUG Subject: RE: FW: [SLUG] uptimes ... No one actually logs into it except me. It's a mistake to think that a box with no users is not busy. Many computers do very important functions autonomously

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-28 Thread Erich Schulz
External modem On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, you wrote: Erich Schulz wrote: My web server at home is 33Meg Dx, works just fine on my US robotics 56K modem: Check it out (excuse the state of the web page) http://www.instrumental.com.au Is that an internal, or external modem? -- Erich

RE: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-27 Thread Aravind Naidu
Problem is now that I have to down the damn thing again to add another drive... DAMN , it's not fair. That is when you wish Linux had a LVM built in ala AIX. (hoping for in kernel 2.4) Then you could have added the disk and all that without rebooting as long as your h/w supports it. --

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-27 Thread Howard Lowndes
Hand up here. ...and this was the last power out: # ssh janus 'uptime' Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. 1:57pm up 56 days, 19 min, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ...but I can give you this one with the office having been flooded twice during

Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

2000-06-27 Thread Shaun Cloherty
George Vieira wrote: Has anybody have large amount of users on?? These 0,1,2 users are a bit low for uptime... my little gateway probably has clocked up a bit but it doesn't mean much if there isn't any users on it. We have a P133/64Mb here with ~20 user accounts. It functions primarily as a