Hi Bill,
I think the command you're looking for is `sacctmgr show event`.
Best,
Steve
From: slurm-users On Behalf Of Bill
Benedetto
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 13:21
To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
Subject: [slurm-users] Slurm node history / log ?
Good day.
Is there some command that I
Hi Bill,
Your best bet is probably /var/log/slurmctld on the server that is acting as
active controller.
Best,
--
Roberto P. Monti
DevOps Engineer I
roberto.mo...@jax.org
The Jackson Laboratory
United States | China | Japan
www.jax.org
From: slurm-users On Behalf Of Bill
Benedetto
Sent:
Good day.
Is there some command that I can use in Slurm to see a node's history?
Not the job history, but the state history.
Something like:
Jul 5 13:11:01 node01 taken offline by slurmctld because node01 not responding
And/Or:
Jul 5 13:11:01 node01 taken offline by USER1 state=DRAIN
Hi Paul,Thank you for the explanations. Actually this was not the main point of the question asked. I think we can close the discussions. The main point was: why a job is running more efficiently using sbatch than salloc.Thank you all for the contributions. - MikeSent from my iPhoneOn Jul 5, 2023,
You should check whether the relevant group's members can be seen using
command `getent group `. If not, you probably need to
add/change the "winbind expand groups" option in smb.conf.
Xand
On 05/07/2023 17:17, Matthias Leopold wrote:
Thanks, but unfortunately that didn't help.
Regards,
Mike,
I think your definitions are probably in the minority on this list.
To be clear, I am *not* saying you (or SGE) are wrong, just that the folk
here use different terms for what you are asking for.
I think of it like dialects of English where the same food might be a
"cookie" or a "biscuit"
Thanks, but unfortunately that didn't help.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 05.07.23 um 17:59 schrieb Marko Markoc:
Hi Matthias,
Before you start digging deeper into this, I would recommend restarting
the `slurmctld` service. I've had similar issues where `scontrol
reconfigure` wasn't enough for
Hi Matthias,
Before you start digging deeper into this, I would recommend restarting the
`slurmctld` service. I've had similar issues where `scontrol reconfigure`
wasn't enough for certain configuration changes.
Regards,
Marko
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:57 AM Matthias Leopold <
Thank you Loris, for the further feedback.
“Reasonable” for SGE is within a few minutes, would be nice if it could be
adjusted.
Still interactive means the user has almost immediate access to the system, not
queued.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 5, 2023, at 9:43 AM, Loris Bennett wrote:
>
Mike Mikailov writes:
> Thank you Loris, for the further clarifications. The only question is
> who will wait forever in interactive mode? And how practical is it?
>
> Interactive mode is what its name implies - interactive, not queueing.
To me, "interactive" is the alternative to "batch" -
Mohamad,
It seems you need to upgrade the GCC on the GPU nodes of cluster A and C.
The error message says that the srun needs newer GCC libs. Or you can
downgrade your SLURM(like recompile it using GCC 2.27 or older) on cluster
A/C.
Best,
Feng
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM mohammed shambakey
Thank you Loris, for the further clarifications. The only question is who will
wait forever in interactive mode? And how practical is it?
Interactive mode is what its name implies - interactive, not queueing.
It would make more sense if the default setting for deadline would be set to a
12 matches
Mail list logo
