Dimitris Zacharopoulos mailto:dzach...@harica.gr> >
Subject: RE: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
allowance
Yep. If you use a SDO OID, you MUST use it in compliance with all the
associated restrictions in the relevant standard.
Otherwise you’re using the OID
> Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos mailto:dzach...@harica.gr>>
> Subject: RE: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and
> SBR allowance
>
> Yep. If you use a SDO OID, you MUST use it in compliance with all the
> associated restrictions in the relevan
poulos
Subject: RE: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
allowance
Yep. If you use a SDO OID, you MUST use it in compliance with all the
associated restrictions in the relevant standard.
Otherwise you’re using the OID for something else entirely, which you do not
).
-Tim
From: Clint Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 3:19 PM
To: Martijn Katerbarg ; SMIME Certificate
Working Group
Cc: Tim Hollebeek ; Dimitris Zacharopoulos
Subject: Re: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
allowance
While I think I agree
o: Dimitris Zacharopoulos ; SMIME Certificate Working
> Group
> Cc: Martijn Katerbarg
> Subject: RE: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and
> SBR allowance
>
> Absolutely. Any OID that comes from a Standards Development Organization is
> intended
:58:58 pm
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos ; SMIME Certificate Working
Group
Cc: Martijn Katerbarg
Subject: RE: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
allowance
Absolutely. Any OID that comes from a Standards Development Organization is
intended for use by other organizations, and
Group
Cc: Martijn Katerbarg
Subject: Re: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
allowance
I also believe that any publicly supported and documented X.509 extension (e.g.
defined by IETF or ITU-T) are allowed for use by CAs, as long as they are
documented in the CA's
t; -Tim
>
> *From:* Smcwg-public *On Behalf Of
> *Martijn Katerbarg via Smcwg-public
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2024 5:54 AM
> *To:* SMIME Certificate Working Group
> *Subject:* [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
> allowance
>
> H
-public
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 5:54 AM
To: SMIME Certificate Working Group
Subject: [Smcwg-public] Certificate Template Information extension and SBR
allowance
Hi all,
There’s been a request within the S/MIME working group to bring forward issues
that have arisen since the adoption
Hi all,
There’s been a request within the S/MIME working group to bring forward issues
that have arisen since the adoption of the SBRs. While we’ve not seen a whole
lot of issues, we believe we may have discovered one now.
We offer support for Windows’s own auto-enrollment features. In the
10 matches
Mail list logo
