Hi,
I have 4 node SolrCloud without replicas with solr-4-10-3. If I add a 5th
node (i.e 5 node SolrCloud without replicas) and do a re-indexing kindly
let me know:
What effect we can expect in sorting and grouping performance as compared
to 4 node SolrCloud VS 5 node SolrCloud? The document is
What I really meant is trying to get cluster status directly through ZK
API. Your approach a bit different from what I meant but it's a nice one as
it seems will work across versions 4 and 5.
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
This is not a problem. The message is logged during replication where it
tries to find files that are mis-matched between leader and replica to
determine whether a full or a partial replication is to be performed. If
you actually get an exception in the logs saying CorruptIndexException then
it is
The other question is how often do prices change? Is it much more often than
other product info (or per-user-and-product info)?
These are use cases for things like CurrencyField and ExternalFileField.The
thing to know about these is that CurrencyField values are searchable, while
OKay. Thanks Shalin.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not a problem. The message is logged during replication where it
tries to find files that are mis-matched between leader and replica to
determine whether
What do the error logs say?
Allan.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
One of my shard is down, it is also not recovering at all. It is down from
last 4 hours. What should I do? What could be the reasons behind this?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Erick,
I do not give it an explicit name. I use call like:
curl
172.29.24.47:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=ADDREPLICAcollection=kla_collectionshard=shard25node=172.29.24.75:8983_solr
It does not appear to be reusing the name, if by name you mean core_node*, or
core. Both are different
I don't quite follow. Are you saying that you intend to use the ZK REST API
to fetch live_nodes and then send the 'clusterstatus' API call to one of
the live nodes?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Ahmed Adel ahmed.a...@badrit.com wrote:
In fact, the advantage I see of using ZK is that we don't
Hi Ahmed,
Can you give more details? What did you expect and what was the actual?
Also, are you looking directly at the clusterstate.json inside ZooKeeper or
are you using the 'clusterstatus' Collection API?
You shouldn't look at the clusterstate.json directly because 1) things like
live-ness is
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 14:00 -0700, pras.venkatesh wrote:
1. 8 nodes, 4 shards(2 nodes per shard)
2. each node having about 55 GB of Data, in total there is 450 million
documents in the collection. so the document size is not huge,
So ~120M docs/shard.
3. The schema has 42 fields, it gets
I don't have a filter cache, and have completely disabled filter cache. Since
I am not using filter queries.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-in-solr-4-8-1-tp4198488p4198716.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Can anyone please tell me how does shard replication work when the indexes
are stored in HDFS? i..e with HDFS, the default replication factor is 3.
Now, for the Solr shards, if I set the replication factor to 3 again, does
that mean, internally index data is replicated thrice and then HDFS
In fact, the advantage I see of using ZK is that we don't have to iterate
over nodes in case the first node receiving that request is down, whereas,
by using ZK REST API, we can do that in a single request as I assume we can
check live_nodes (in case this approach is guaranteed when using Solr
You can use Result Grouping by a function using query(), but you'll need a
version of Lucene with this bug fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7046
Ryan
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Jens Mayer mjen...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Hey everybody,
I have the following situation in my
Hi,
I have created lucene indexes of data stored in accumulo in HDFS.
Lucene queries are working fine over that but I want to use those indexes to be
searched via accumulo means the lucene queries should run via accumulo.Do you
have any idea about that if it is related to what you are trying
Hi,
I am getting this type of error while indexing on solr cloud. Could
somebody help, I have no knowledge what it is.
WARN - 2015-04-09 07:11:27.705; org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller; File
_p_Lucene50_0.tip did not match. expected checksum is 1515849197 and actual
is checksum 1522458868.
Please always report the Solr version whenever you are reporting a problem.
It helps us track down issues faster. Please also post the complete ZK tree
using a pastebin or gist.github.com link. You can copy the entire ZK tree
from the Admin UI under Cloud Dump tab.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:47
Hi,
I apologize if this question is redundant. I've spent a few days on it and
scoured the Internet; I know that this question has been asked and answered
in various capacities for different versions of Solr; the reason I am
inquiring to this mailing list is because what I am attempting to do
Yes, you can use the 'clusterstatus' API which will return an aggregation
of all states. See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-api18
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Ahmed Adel ahmed.a...@badrit.com wrote:
Hi Shalin,
Thanks for your response. I'm
Hi,
One of my shard is down, it is also not recovering at all. It is down from
last 4 hours. What should I do? What could be the reasons behind this?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Sorry but I unable to find anything wrong in the logs.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Allan Kamau kamaual...@gmail.com wrote:
What do the error logs say?
Allan.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
One of my shard
For backup purposes to an offsite data center, I need to make sure that each
core's configuration has replication to a consistently defined backup directory
on a Netapp filer. The Netapp filer's snapshot can be invoked manually, and
its snap mirror will copy the data to the offsite data
Thanks a lot Erick, your suggestion on using similarity will work great; I
wasn't aware you could define similarity on a field by field basis until
now, and that solution works perfectly.
Sorry what I said was a little misleading. I should have said I don't want
it to issue phrase queries to that
Hi All,
On Solr 5.0 and ZK 3.4.6 sometimes clusterstate.json does not reflect the
aggregation of states of collections, the latter is always correct. I could
verify this from the admin panel (under Tree view) and from ZKCli. Is there
something I'm missing that could generate this issue?
--
A.
Yes. 3 replicas and an HDFS replication factor of 3 means 9 copies of
the index are laying around. You can change your HDFS replication
factor, but that affects other applications using HDFS, so that may
not be an option.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Vijaya Narayana Reddy Bhoomi
Hey everybody,
I have the following situation in my search application: I've been searching
street sources. By executing a search I receive several matches. The first 10
matches are displayed. But in this situation a part of the results are nearly
the same.As example if I seach for Berlin I'll
Hi Shalin,
Thanks for your response. I'm actually looking inside ZooKeeper in order to
obtain highest availability. What I expected is that clusterstate.json
contains the aggregation of all state.json children nodes of each
collection. But your second paragraph explains the behavior I see in Solr
27 matches
Mail list logo
