Prasad
Tech Lead @ flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
/enableLazyFieldLoading
queryResultWindowSize20/queryResultWindowSize
queryResultMaxDocsCached200/queryResultMaxDocsCached
Solr version is 4.10.3
Any of help is appreciated!
sergey
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Tech Lead @ flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6
Shvets ser...@bintime.com wrote:
LRUCache
It
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Tech Lead @ flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
However you will need to form the group queries before hand.
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search
Lead@
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
have seen this page before but it is not providing the functionality that I
need, because the timestamp interval would
definition.
Is there a way I can plugin some code that gets run before any schema
or
solrconfigs are parsed? That way I could write a property loader that
adds
properties from ${solr.env}.properties to the JVM system properties.
Thanks!
Ryan
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
See also the wiki page on logging jars and Solr:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrLogging
Thanks,
Shawn
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search l...@flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
Hi,
I am very new to solr.How can I allow solr search on a string field case
insensitive and substring?.
Thanks,
Nishanth
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search l...@flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
-tp4153462.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search l...@flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
-SOLR-rows-per-field-based-on-field-value-tp4153441.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search l...@flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
--
A.Nazemian
--
A.Nazemian
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search l...@flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
I set params at search component?
Thanks,
Chunki.
--
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search l...@flipkart.com
in.linkedin.com/pub/umesh-prasad/6/5bb/580/
provide me your inputs.
Thanks Regards,
Smitha
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
- User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Umesh Prasad
Steffensen
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Shuffle-results-a-little-tp1891206p4149973.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
numbers (values). The cache code does take *keys* from the old cache
for the new cache, but not *values*. I'm very sure about this, as I
wrote the current (and not terribly good) LFUCache.
Thanks,
Shawn
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
for doing this or point to relevant code examples?
Thank you very much and have a good day!
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Solr log, I can identify exactly which is the corrupted
document.
My question:
Is it possible to identify the problematic document at the client side?
(for
recovery purposes)
Thanks,
Liram
Email secured by Check Point
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
. Is this
possible?
Cheers,
Bjørn
2014-07-18 19:00 GMT+02:00 Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com:
Comments inline
On 16 July 2014 20:31, Bjørn Axelsen bjorn.axel...@fagkommunikation.dk
wrote:
Hi Solr users
I would appreciate your inputs on how to handle a *mix *of *simple
++) {
matches[i] = parentIter.nextDoc();
}
return new SortedIntDocSet(matches); // you will need
SortedIntDocSet impl else docset interaction in some facet queries fails
later.
}
On 22 July 2014 19:59, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Query parentFilterQuery = new TermQuery
.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
builder there ..
However, as you can see, ngrams based queries will results into a lot of
clauses n^2 .. exactly for just one field .. And if you are searching
across multiple fields then it will go to m * n ^ 2..
On 20 July 2014 10:31, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Please ignore my
.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
PS : You can give huge boosts to url at query time on a per request basis.
Don't specify the bqs on solrconfig.xml .. Always determine add bqs for the
query at run time..
On 18 July 2014 15:49, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Or you can give huge boosts to url at query time. If you
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Match-query-string-within-indexed-field-tp4147896.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
?
- or -
4) ... or is there a smarter way?
Your help is very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Bjørn Axelsen
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
, suggestions ?
Thanks
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST$Arc
19: 13,020 6,874,560
org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST$Arc[]
debugQuery_jmap.txt
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
increased maxThreads to some higher value, and
then it works again.
I would like to know why solr is behaving abnormally, initially when it
was
working with maxThreads=200.
Please provide me some pointers.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
the query.
Thank you for your help,
Aaron
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
.
:
: --
: A.Nazemian
:
:
:
:
:
: --
: A.Nazemian
:
-Hoss
http://www.lucidworks.com/
--
A.Nazemian
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
with
useFilterForSortedQuery=true if scoring is not needed for the collapse.
I'll take a closer look at this.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thanks a lot for clarification .. An error message would indeed
with hits.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi ,
Found another bug with CollapsignQParserPlugin. Not a critical one.
It throws an exception when used with
useFilterForSortedQuery true
critea: cscore(),
which returns the score, would be the primary criteria. The recip of field
x would be the secondary criteria.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Continuing the discussion
$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:360)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
logic.
Because of (a) the group head selected by CollapsingQParserPlugin will be
incorrect and subsequent sorting will break.
On 14 June 2014 12:38, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Joel for the quick response. I have opened a new jira ticket.
https://issues.apache.org/jira
, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
The patch in SOLR-5408 fixes the issue with sorting only for two sort
fields. Sorting still breaks when 3 or more sort fields are used.
I have attached a test case, which demonstrates the broken behavior when
3
sort fields are used
number
1602388
Can someone apply and verify the bug ?
Also, should I re-open SOLR-5408 or open a new ticket ?
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
it will be in there. If not it will be Solr 4.7.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5408
Joel
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Issue occurs in Single Segment index also ..
sort: score desc,floSalesRank asc
response: {
- numFound: 21461
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5408 ..
The bug is closed but I am not really sure that it works specially for
Multiple segment parts ..
I am using Solr 4.6.0 and my index contains 4 segments ..
Have anyone else faced the same issue ?
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
at 9:50 AM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am using new CollapsingQParserPlugin for Grouping and found that it
works incorrectly when I use multiple sort criteria.
http://localhost:8080/solr/toys/select/?q=car%20and%20toysversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onsort=score
Mailing list by default removes attachments. So uploaded it to google drive
..
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-RnB4e-vaJhX280NVllMUdHYWs/edit?usp=sharing
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We are seeing memory leaks in our Search
memory usage is so high on indexer.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/21/2013 9:22 PM, Umesh Prasad wrote:
This is our own implementation of data source (canon name
com.flipkart.w3.solr.MultiSPCMSProductsDataSource) , which pulls the data
-Original Message- From: Umesh Prasad
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Hard Commit giving OOM Error on Index Writer in Solr 4.2.1
Hi All,
I am hitting an OOM error while trying to do an hard commit on one of
the cores.
Transaction log dir
, May 22, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/21/2013 5:14 PM, Umesh Prasad wrote:
We have sufficient RAM on machine ..64 GB and we have given JVM 32 GB of
memory. The machine runs Indexing primarily.
The JVM doesn't run out of memory. It is the particular
)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Sorry for late reply. I was trying to change our indexing pipeline and do
explicit intermediate commits for each core. That turned out to be a bit
more work that I have time for.
So, I do want to explore hard commits. I tried
solr-host:port/solr/core/*update?commit=true* . But there is no
Regards
Umesh Prasad
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
How big are you transaction logs? They can be replayed on startup.
They are truncated and a new one started when you do a hard commit
(openSearcher true or false doesn't matter).
So a quick test
of about 40 Cores. This was
the same with Solr 3.5 also. But we never faced any issues.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
a compilation failure.
-Hoss
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Further update on same.
Build on Branch
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1 succeeds
fine.
Build fails only for Source code downloaded from
http://apache.techartifact.com/mirror/lucene/solr/4.2.1/solr-4.2.1-src.tgz
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Umesh Prasad
from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Root caused the Issue to a Code Bug / Contract Violation in SnapPuller
in
solr 4.2.1 (impacts trunk as well) and Fixed by Patching the SnapPuller
)
The fix is pass along the version to fetchFileList and populate it.
A Patch is attached for trunk.
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
Search Engineer @ Flipkart : India's Online Megastore
-
Empowering Consumers Find Products ..
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote
,
- _45e1.nrm,
- _45e2_1.del,
- _45e2.frq,
- _45e1_3.del,
- _45e1.tis,
- ..
Can someone help. Our whole Migration to Solr 4.2 is blocked on Replication
issue.
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
(someone in your company mirrors them internally or via a
downstream project)
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
60 matches
Mail list logo
