Hi Adrian,
Best wishes to you too.
Many thanks again for your most valuable feedback and suggestions on this
document.
Cheers,
Francois
On Dec 30, 2023 at 17:24:26, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi Francois and best wishes for the New Year.
>
> Tl;dr This is good work. Thank you for the effort.
>
To clarify one question I noted in the below agreements, once all the
open isues have been closed, I expect that the editors will remove the
appendix that tracks them. We asked that they be included in the draft
so that WG participants would be more aware of them (as people often do
not look
Hi Francois and best wishes for the New Year.
Tl;dr This is good work. Thank you for the effort.
Individual responses in line.
Adrian
> Thank you for this follow-up.
>
> Indeed, we were still working on some of your comments when revision -09
> was pushed. Those remaining comments should now
Thanks Francois, I appreciate the update.
Christmas is the time when I do some of my best work, so I hope to respond to all this before the New Year.
Best,
Adrian
On 18/12/2023 13:17 GMT Francois Clad wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Thank you for this follow-up.
Indeed, we were still working on some of your comments when revision -09
was pushed. Those remaining comments should now be addressed in revision
-10 (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/10/
).
Please see our reply to
Hi again Francois,
Thanks for your patience while I got back from Prague.
I have looked through the diffs and respond in line below.
This is good work, and captures very nearly everything. I snipped out every
point of agreement.
Best,
Adrian
>> 0. Please get into the habit
'
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08
Hi,
This review is in answer to Joel's request on the mailing list. I come to
this document without a lot of history on SRH compression (although
I had some chats with Cheng Li, which helped me
'SPRING WG List'
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi,
This review is in answer to Joel's request on the mailing list. I come to this
document without a lot of history on SRH compression (
Hi,
This review is in answer to Joel's request on the mailing list. I come to
this document without a lot of history on SRH compression (although
I had some chats with Cheng Li, which helped me to not embarrass
myself with some of my more stupid questions) and I have deliberately
not read any of