Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2024-01-09 Thread Francois Clad
Hi Adrian, Best wishes to you too. Many thanks again for your most valuable feedback and suggestions on this document. Cheers, Francois On Dec 30, 2023 at 17:24:26, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi Francois and best wishes for the New Year. > > Tl;dr This is good work. Thank you for the effort. >

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-12-30 Thread Joel Halpern
To clarify one question I noted in the below agreements, once all the open isues have been closed, I expect that the editors will remove the appendix that tracks them.  We asked that they be included in the draft so that WG participants would be more aware of them (as people often do not look

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-12-30 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi Francois and best wishes for the New Year. Tl;dr This is good work. Thank you for the effort. Individual responses in line. Adrian > Thank you for this follow-up. > > Indeed, we were still working on some of your comments when revision -09 > was pushed. Those remaining comments should now

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-12-18 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks Francois, I appreciate the update.   Christmas is the time when I do some of my best work, so I hope to respond to all this before the New Year.   Best, Adrian On 18/12/2023 13:17 GMT Francois Clad wrote:

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-12-18 Thread Francois Clad
Hi Adrian, Thank you for this follow-up. Indeed, we were still working on some of your comments when revision -09 was pushed. Those remaining comments should now be addressed in revision -10 ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/10/ ). Please see our reply to

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-11-16 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi again Francois, Thanks for your patience while I got back from Prague. I have looked through the diffs and respond in line below. This is good work, and captures very nearly everything. I snipped out every point of agreement. Best, Adrian >> 0. Please get into the habit

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-09-21 Thread Weiqiang Cheng
' CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08 Hi, This review is in answer to Joel's request on the mailing list. I come to this document without a lot of history on SRH compression (although I had some chats with Cheng Li, which helped me

Re: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Bonica
'SPRING WG List' Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi, This review is in answer to Joel's request on the mailing list. I come to this document without a lot of history on SRH compression (

[spring] A review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08

2023-09-21 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi, This review is in answer to Joel's request on the mailing list. I come to this document without a lot of history on SRH compression (although I had some chats with Cheng Li, which helped me to not embarrass myself with some of my more stupid questions) and I have deliberately not read any of