The IESG has received a request from the Source Packet Routing in Networking
WG (spring) to consider the following document: - 'Path Segment in MPLS Based
Segment Routing Network'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on
ft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segm...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* ietf-annou...@ietf.org; andrew-i...@liquid.tech;
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com; spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org;
> last-c...@ietf.org; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] Last Call:
> (Path Segment in MPL
Hi Ketan,
Many thanks for your thorough review, and sorry for my delay.
Please see my reply inline. BTW, the proposed update is attached, authors
please review as well.
You can also review it from the Github repository.
Hello Authors,
Please find below some comments on the draft. I hope these can be addressed
to fix/improve the document.
Major:
1) Sec 1: The term "SR path" is not defined in either RFC8402 or RFC9256.
It seems this document is trying to introduce this terminology/concept. If
so, it needs to be
Hi all,
I reviewed this document a couple of times as it progressed through the
working group, and my comments were addressed.
Here is an additional, small point. In Section 2 you have:
When Path Segment is not allocated from the SRGB pool, the
intermediate nodes MUST not see the Path
The IESG has received a request from the Source Packet Routing in Networking
WG (spring) to consider the following document: - 'Path Segment in MPLS Based
Segment Routing Network'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on
