;
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* spring *On Behalf Of *
> bruno.decra...@orange.com
> *Sent:* 26 September 2022 12:52
> *To:* Kamran Raza (skraza) ;
> draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-y...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* SPRING WG ; Dhruv Dhody
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-p
-spring-sr-policy-y...@ietf.org
Cc: SPRING WG ; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01
Hi Kamran, authors,
Thanks for the refreshed draft.
What's the status/ETA with regards to incorporating comments from the WG,
e.g. the ones below from Dhruv which are two
To: Kamran Raza (skraza)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-y...@ietf.org; SPRING WG
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01
Hi Kamran,
Thank you! The most important thing to me would be to make the model work at
the device as well as the controller (an example that would be adding
Hi Kamran,
Thank you! The most important thing to me would be to make the model work
at the device as well as the controller (an example that would be adding
headend into the SR-policy).
Thanks!
Dhruv
PS. Past comments I sent during adoption -
Hi Dhruv,
The I.D will be refreshed and updated once submissions reopen.
Apologies for the extended delay in updating it ..
Rgds.
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:12 AM
To: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-y...@ietf.org
, SPRING WG
Subject: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01
Hi Authors/WG,
The I-D in question expired last year!
In fact, there has been no change since its adoption back in May of 2019.
None of the comments received during the adoption calls are handled -
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9Hy8jfOmVP9vmXXaSJ6mISwYCRM/
BTW there are various
