Fixed now (I think). Thanks for the bug reports
On 1/30/18, William Entriken wrote:
> Hello again. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.6.
> Currently:
>
>> This race condition had apparently existing in all prior versions of
> SQLite...
>
> Should
Hello again. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.6.
Currently:
> This race condition had apparently existing in all prior versions of
SQLite...
Should be:
> This race condition had apparently existed in all prior versions of
SQLite...
Regards,
William Entriken
Hello. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.3.
Perhaps this should be
> 8.3. I/O error while obtaining a lock leads to corruption
Regards,
William Entriken
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
I have checked in changes (written by Dan) that should address your
concerns. The next release of SQLite will probably run the Makefile
to completion without errors in your environment.
NB: This is not an error in SQLite. The problem is in a Makefile
such that the Makefile does not play well
Probably best reserved for initialization of a shard of a database where
you can set next to last of a prior .db.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:14 AM, petern wrote:
> For one, within a function that does an INSERT, set_last_insert_rowid makes
> it possible to "pop"
System.Data.SQLite version 1.0.107.0 (with SQLite 3.22.0) is now available
on the System.Data.SQLite website:
https://system.data.sqlite.org/
Further information about this release can be seen at:
https://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/news.wiki
Please post on the
I don't need this program so delete this.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:15 AM, petern wrote:
For one, within a function that does an INSERT, set_last_insert_rowid makes
it possible to "pop" last_insert_rowid.
Consider a function
For one, within a function that does an INSERT, set_last_insert_rowid makes
it possible to "pop" last_insert_rowid.
Consider a function which INSERT's into the model and then INSERT's a log
table row. The caller probably isn't interested in the log rowid.
A better question to ask is always why
Ok, thanks.
Should have looked at that.
RBS
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> See http://sqlite.org/c3ref/last_insert_rowid.html
>
> "Some virtual table implementations may INSERT rows into rowid tables as
> part of committing a transaction (e.g. to flush
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
See http://sqlite.org/c3ref/last_insert_rowid.html
"Some virtual table implementations may INSERT rows into rowid tables as part
of committing a transaction (e.g. to flush data accumulated in memory to disk).
In this case subsequent calls to this function return the rowid associated with
these
Just wonder what the possible use for this is.
RBS
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
On 1/30/18, Kingle Zhuang wrote:
> shell.c:7098:9: error: 'system' is unavailable: not available on iOS
> x = system(zCmd);
Is the command-line shell in any way useful to iOS? Are you able to
run the command-line shell on iOS? Can you explain to us how you do
shell.c:7098:9: error: 'system' is unavailable: not available on iOS
x = system(zCmd);
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneSimulator11.2.sdk/usr/include/stdlib.h:195:6:
note: 'system' has been explicitly marked
The feature in last paragraph is already the case with plain ORDER BY. All
records in "group" order.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
Auftrag von Stephan Buchert
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Jänner 2018 12:17
An:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:16:32 +0100, Stephan Buchert
wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> Allowing non-aggregate columns in aggregate queries is very useful, as
> shown with the min/max functions.
It is forbidden in most SQL dialects, only supported by SQLite
as a dirty
Thanks for the replies.
Allowing non-aggregate columns in aggregate queries is very useful, as
shown with the min/max functions.
Probably with this feature comes that SQLite even allows all non-aggregate
columns in SELECTs with GROUP BY. Perhaps the documentation should warn
more clearly, that
>CREATE TABLE t1 (a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE t2 (a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE t3 (a INTEGER);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ndx on t3(a);
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT t1.a FROM t1 left join t2 using (a);
0|0|0|SCAN TABLE t1
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT t1.a FROM t1 left join t3 using (a);
18 matches
Mail list logo