Re: [sqlite] [EXTERNAL] Re: Fill empty space with random

2018-10-15 Thread Hick Gunter
For an encryption scheme to suffer enigma machine type vulnerabilities, the concept behind it must predate WWII. IIRC the last straw (apart from known clear text like all messages ending with the same greeting) the broke the enigma encoding was the fact that a radio operator on an italian ship

[sqlite] Missing SQLITE_OMIT_* in https://www.sqlite.org/compile.html

2018-10-15 Thread Dominique Pellé
Hi I noticed that the recently added options SQLITE_OMIT_WINDOWFUNC and SQLITE_OMIT_UPSERT are not described at: https://www.sqlite.org/compile.html. I suppose that they should be described in that page. Perhaps there are other SQLITE_OMIT_* options missing in the page. I did not check all

Re: [sqlite] Fill empty space with random

2018-10-15 Thread thilo jeremias
> > In the simple case, the VFS that the sqlite Db is mounted in is encrypted > with a long key. The key has cycles at 4096(A) and 16(B1-Bn) bytes > (4096/16 = 256 cycles of Bn); such that each sector is masked with > A^B1(256x), A^B2(256x), ... all together there is no repetition because the >

Re: [sqlite] SQLite mailing list [was: SQLite Windows GUI alternative to Excel?]

2018-10-15 Thread Petite Abeille
> On Oct 15, 2018, at 5:36 AM, Rowan Worth wrote: > > Anyway my point is I'm not seeing evidence to support the assertion that > gmail treats messages to the list in general as spammish. Ditto. ___ sqlite-users mailing list

Re: [sqlite] error message: [FireDAC][Phys][SQLite] Database is locked

2018-10-15 Thread Chris Locke
> For the record, "delete the journal file" is terrible advice Agreed. In normal production environment, I wouldn't suggest that. The user was testing a database, and in my own developemtn cycle, its common when developing for a database to be in all manners of chaos states. It was purely a

Re: [sqlite] error message: [FireDAC][Phys][SQLite] Database is locked

2018-10-15 Thread R Smith
On 2018/10/15 5:05 AM, Rowan Worth wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 02:20, Lars Frederiksen wrote: Any ideas? Not sure if this got resolved off-list, but based on the code you've posted I wonder if there is an "fdqGloser" as well as an "fdqGloser2", and if so what state it is in. Update: