On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 10:11 -0700, Jim Dodgen wrote:
> SQLite is rock solid.
>
> Also I don't think it wise to develop on a different DBMS that the one
> you are going to use in production.
Perhaps Sebastian Stephenson was referring to the "stand-in for an
enterprise database during demos or
SQLite is rock solid.
Also I don't think it wise to develop on a different DBMS that the one
you are going to use in production.
sebastian stephenson wrote:
> I see that sqlite is great for development but for production would
> that be a bright idea?
> see ya
>
> sebey
>
>
>
On Sat, 10 May 2008, sebastian stephenson wrote:
> I see that sqlite is great for development but for production would that
> be a bright idea?
In addition to Roger's comment, take a look at the web site. The home page
shows that Adobe, Mozilla, and Symbian are sponsors.
Why would you
2008/5/10 sebastian stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I see that sqlite is great for development but for production would
> that be a bright idea?
> see ya
>
it you develop a single user embedded sw than sqlite is a good solution, if
you develop a db for a really BIG with many concurrent write
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sebastian stephenson wrote:
> I see that sqlite is great for development but for production would
> that be a bright idea?
http://sqlite.org/famous.html
There are many many other people using it production, such as the
majority of people on this
I see that sqlite is great for development but for production would
that be a bright idea?
see ya
sebey
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
6 matches
Mail list logo
