Re: Re: [sqlite] Selecting a random row from a table

Thomas Chust,您好！ the mail num is so many, how can cancel the maillist. === 2006-04-16 16:03:00 您在来信中写道：=== On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a table of strings and integer primary keys from which I would like

Re: [sqlite] How to convert a sqlite table in a sqlite db into a text file?

Am 17.4.06 um 10:58 schrieb 杰 张: Hi,all I just want to implement to download a sqlite table in a sqlite db from IE browser , but I must first convert sqlite format into text format for reading data information of the table. I want to finish the conversion automatically through

Re: [sqlite] MMAP

On 4/16/06, John Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Stanton wrote: I wonder if members can help me with some advice. I have a program which is a multi-threaded application server with Sqlite embedded which runs on Unix and Windows. For an i/o buffer per thread I have the idea of

[sqlite] indexes

Hi, I just want to know, if we create an index on any table, how the index is stored, is it stored in a seperate file or as part of the current table only in the same file. Cheers, Chetana - New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call

[sqlite] Re: indexes

chetana bhargav bhargav_chetana-/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just want to know, if we create an index on any table, how the index is stored, is it stored in a seperate file or as part of the current table only in the same file. With SQLite, the whole database is stored in a single file - all

Re: [sqlite] indexes

Am I correct in saying that once we create an index on a table what ever the new records added would be done according to the index mentioned. If so, if we create an index on a table which has already some records then will those records be re-arranged. Jay Sprenkle [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sqlite] indexes

On 4/17/06, chetana bhargav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I correct in saying that once we create an index on a table what ever the new records added would be done according to the index mentioned. If so, if we create an index on a table which has already some records then will those

Re: [sqlite] indexes

Thanks for the info. Cheers, Chetana. Jay Sprenkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/17/06, chetana bhargav wrote: Am I correct in saying that once we create an index on a table what ever the new records added would be done according to the index mentioned. If so, if we create an index

Re: [sqlite] indexes

Some DBMS's (PostgreSQL comes to mind) do allow you to create an index which also forces the data to be ordered. This can speed up some patterns of read access, but makes inserts quite expensive and should be used only with extreme caution. chetana bhargav wrote: Thanks for the info.

Re: [sqlite] indexes

Some DBMS's (PostgreSQL comes to mind) do allow you to create an index which also forces the data to be ordered. This can speed up some patterns of read access, but makes inserts quite expensive and should be used only with extreme caution. MS Sqlserver calls them 'clustered indexes'.

Re: [sqlite] what is faster?

Thanks Richard Hipp and it will be more easy to use all in one file... thanks for your help On 4/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cesar David Rodas Maldonado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any one can answer me? On 4/15/06, Cesar David Rodas Maldonado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[sqlite] Transactions and sqlite3_last_insert_rowid

I'm trying to figure out how sqlite3_last_insert_rowid() interacts with transactions. I've read the thread at http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg13393.html However, the concern raised in the last message of that thread is exactly my concern, and was never addressed in the

Re: [sqlite] Transactions and sqlite3_last_insert_rowid

On 4/17/06, Michael Ekstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, if someone could enlighten me as to the defined behavior of sqlite3_last_insert_rowid with regards to transactions, I would be most grateful. The last insert id is a property of a connection. So there is no way that one connection can

[sqlite] threading issues laid to rest?

Hello all, I was researching the meaning of the configure parameter --enable-cross-thread-connections (Allow connection sharing across threads). I've not found it documented anywhere, but in the 3.3.1 changelog I find Database connections can now be used by multiple threads, not just the thread

Re: [sqlite] threading issues laid to rest?

Ron, Shac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this mean that issues pertaining to threads, particularly in passing a sqlite3* between threads, are now resolved? This issue is a bug in some versions of Linux (2.4 kernels with particular combinations of pthreads and glibc.) The problem is that