Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/20/10 2:57 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/20 Jon Bonillama...@aholab.ehu.es: El Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:11:22 +0200 Iñaki Baz Castilloi...@aliax.net escribió: Integrating XMPP into SIP is a workaround IMHO, but the fact that some work is being done in this area confirms the failure

Re: [SR-Users] HTable 'size' parameter

2010-10-21 Thread Elena-Ramona Modroiu
Maybe the term entry should be replaced with slot, looks to be more standard. A good doc about hash tables is on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table The htable module keeps the number of items in a slot, but not exported via rpc, this could be added in the future. Ramona On

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis user guide

2010-10-21 Thread Elena-Ramona Modroiu
We can start a wiki page for it. Next version, 2.0, has a module that allows embedded help, but others should jump in and contribute. Ramona On 10/09/2010 10:11 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: It's a front-end to streamline and automate the presentation of things with which users of Kamailio/SR are

Re: [SR-Users] siremis 2.0 ?

2010-10-21 Thread Elena-Ramona Modroiu
Hi, On 10/08/2010 01:54 PM, X- x -X wrote: Hey all, Congratulation on 3.1 release ! Any news on when siremis v 2.0 is hitting the stores ? we try for next week, at least a public beta. In the mean time what about alpha/beta version of it ? Its nowhere on the repos/sites (asipto etc..)

Re: [SR-Users] siremis 1.0.1 with kamalio 3.1 ?

2010-10-21 Thread Elena-Ramona Modroiu
Hi, you can use 1.0.1 for all modules that had no change to database structure. See the wiki page of kamailio that lists changes done towards 3.1.0. On 10/12/2010 02:10 PM, X- x -X wrote: Hi all, Not sure if this should be put to siremis list or dev list or whatever but bear with me if you

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: I think it is just failure of one model over-complicated, the Presence Agent. SIP has also end-to-end presence and it was/is working perfect in most of the cases. Hi, I don't agree. SIP end-to-end presence fails when coming to privacy

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 10/21/10 11:20 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com: I think it is just failure of one model over-complicated, the Presence Agent. SIP has also end-to-end presence and it was/is working perfect in most of the cases. Hi, I don't agree.

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis user guide

2010-10-21 Thread Shrouk Khan
anyone knows when the v2.0 will be publicly available. it looks very impressive. On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Elena-Ramona Modroiu ram...@asipto.comwrote: We can start a wiki page for it. Next version, 2.0, has a module that allows embedded help, but others should jump in and contribute.

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: this kind of privacy is affecting the calls as well, for example. I can send you a call or other SIP request to discover you are online/offline. So this is another service that should be applied globally: black-white lists. Having a mechanism just for

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com: this kind of privacy is affecting the calls as well, for example. I can send you a call or other SIP request to discover you are online/offline. So this is another service that should be applied globally: black-white lists. Having a mechanism just

Re: [SR-Users] Integrate xmpp module with kamailio 3.0.x

2010-10-21 Thread Huy Nguyen
Hi Daniel and list, I'm integrating xmpp module to kamailio 3.0.4 with the component mode on my local network. Kamailio: sip.htk.com Jabberd: xmpp2.htk.com With your diagram as the previous mail: xmmp-user --- xmpp-server -- xmpp-to-sip-gateway --- sip-to-xmpp-gateway

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: Hi, I don't agree. SIP end-to-end presence fails when coming to privacy area as the watcher doens't receive the information from a server, but from the watched user itself (so the watcher knows if it's online or not). I've tryed end-to-end

[SR-Users] Kamalio 3.1 based turn-key distribution released !

2010-10-21 Thread X- x -X
Hey all, Just wanted to share this link. A distribution based on debian (lenny) kamailio 3.1 pre-configured with presence server/RTP thing has been released. size: 245 MB. http://ciitix.ciit.net.pk/index.php/home/6-announcements-/14-ciitix-voip-10-released Download link

Re: [SR-Users] Kamalio 3.1 based turn-key distribution released !

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, thanks for sharing it. I find such distro useful for people getting first time in touch with the project. Can you detail a bit more about enabled features? E.g., what database system is used, etc. I can make a news out of it and post it on the web site. Cheers, Daniel On 10/21/10

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 12:09 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Juha Heinanenj...@tutpro.com: this kind of privacy is affecting the calls as well, for example. I can send you a call or other SIP request to discover you are online/offline. So this is another service that should be applied globally:

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 12:20 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com: Hi, I don't agree. SIP end-to-end presence fails when coming to privacy area as the watcher doens't receive the information from a server, but from the watched user itself (so the watcher

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 4:15 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com: On the other hand, this is just exchange of content, like voice call is. I can send to my peer a link to a web resource from where to download Then blocking a user not to view your avatar is

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 4:15 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: [...] And worse: Not all the information a watcher wants to retrieves depends on the watched user itself. The avatar, the user profile (a vCard) is retrieved from the server (this is true in XMPP, MSN, Skype), so distribute presence cannot

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: This is sorted out by location server. iirc, you implemented the filtering based on allowed methods. yes, that takes care of sending subscribe to ua that does not support it. the sad thing is that there are UAs on the marker that don't advertise their

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: Back to first paragraph. Are XMPP, MSN, Skype doing processing to these documents, or are they just pure storage systems for them with a white/black list access policy? In other words, I can publish my vcard and then tell the server if X

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 6:20 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com: Back to first paragraph. Are XMPP, MSN, Skype doing processing to these documents, or are they just pure storage systems for them with a white/black list access policy? In other words, I can

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: The problem right now is interpreting the content - presence information is content. If the server does not understand the Event you subscribe to, bye bye... i agree with that. in one sip ua is was not possible to configure voicemail uri. it assumed that

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: In both XMPP and MSN the avatar and vcard are retrieved by a watcher from the server if the watched gives the watcher permissions, so the server *does* interpret the permissions rules in behalf of the user. How to achieve this logic in a

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com:  i argued that requests should be routed by proxy on r-uri only. Hi, this is not true in all cases. For example when a user sip:al...@dom.com sends a PUBLISH with presence information, the RURI MUST also si sip:al...@dom.com, so if the proxy routes it to

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: The proxy must be ready to route a request not just based on the RURI but also on the method and also on the Event type (a PUBLISH for presence must be routed to the presence server while a PUBLISH for dialog must be routed to some other server). inaki, method is

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com: Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: Then how do you get the proxy routing Event: presence PUBLISH to a server-1 and Event: dialog PUBLISH to server-2? you cannot do it.  it is not supported. Could you explain it please? Also, innovation would also be

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: Then how do you get the proxy routing Event: presence PUBLISH to a server-1 and Event: dialog PUBLISH to server-2? you cannot do it.  it is not supported. Could you explain it please? there is not much to explain. request uri must tell where request is

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com: Could you explain it please? there is not much to explain.  request uri must tell where request is routed.  if that is not enough, then proxy needs to get involved with application level stuff, which locks its use to well known applications. IMHO

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net: - Bob susbcribes to Alice's presence by *indicating* in the SUBSCRIBE body he is interested in presence+status and presence+geolocation events (as Bob's device doesn't understand/implement other presence information and couldn't render it).

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: The fact is that I agree with you. But note that with REGISTER the same occurs. It's very common an architecture in which the client is just provisioned with a domain name, which resolved to its proxy, and such proxy router the REGISTER to a registrar server (even

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com: rfc3261 allows that the ua is configured with address of registrar.  in fact, there are sip UAs that allow configuring registrar differently from proxy. Yes, but isn't nicer provisioning a UA just with AoR, password and domain letting DNS NAPTR/SRV and

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: Yes, but isn't nicer provisioning a UA just with AoR, password and domain letting DNS NAPTR/SRV and routing in the proxy to do their magic? :) you need to draw the line somewhere regarding how much magic proxy does and knows about. there are many levels to it:

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com: Yes, but isn't nicer provisioning a UA just with AoR, password and domain letting DNS NAPTR/SRV and routing in the proxy to do their magic? :) you need to draw the line somewhere regarding how much magic proxy does and knows about.  there are many

[SR-Users] Register a different URI than the received in the To header

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
Hi, not sure if this question has already taken place in this maillist: For some exotic reason sometimes the registrar receives a REGISTER with To: sip:al...@domain.com but I want to save it in the location table as sip:b...@domain.com. AFAIK there is no way to do it, am I wrong? -- Iñaki Baz

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 7:34 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com: In both XMPP and MSN the avatar and vcard are retrieved by a watcher from the server if the watched gives the watcher permissions, so the server *does* interpret the permissions rules in

Re: [SR-Users] Register a different URI than the received in the To header

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 10:05 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: Hi, not sure if this question has already taken place in this maillist: For some exotic reason sometimes the registrar receives a REGISTER with To: sip:al...@domain.com but I want to save it in the location table as sip:b...@domain.com. AFAIK

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 9:31 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: Yes, but isn't nicer provisioning a UA just with AoR, password and domain letting DNS NAPTR/SRV and routing in the proxy to do their magic? :) you need to draw the line somewhere regarding how much magic proxy does and

Re: [SR-Users] Register a different URI than the received in the To header

2010-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/21/10 10:37 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/registrar.html#id2537705 modparam(registrar, aor_avp, $avp(aor)) $avp(aor) = sip:b...@domain.com save(location); Opsss, I was expecting a

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] Fwd: [dispatch] proposed SIXPAC charter

2010-10-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/10/21 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: There are two aspects: 1) real time communication routing - voice, im, presence states 2) offline resource routing - vcard, predefined-content documents 1) can always have a correspondent in 2) while some things in 2) might not be in 1).

Re: [SR-Users] Integrate xmpp module with kamailio 3.0.x

2010-10-21 Thread Huy Nguyen
Hi there, After config the component mode as the guide on xmpp module page, how to check that xmpp module have already registered to the local jabberd server ? I enable debug on kamailio and don't see any thing. Thanks, Huy Nguyen www.htk-inc.com From: huy_quocngu...@live.com To:

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.0 cann't access the RTPProxy

2010-10-21 Thread KevinJin
4(14415) ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2457]: can't send command to a RTP proxy (Invalid argument/22) [sock 7 (0), vcnt 18] Solaris has limit on the vcnt which is 16 at MAX, after change vcnt from 18 to 14, nathelper works. Just not sure if this will have side effect or not. Comments on this

[SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1 compile issue on Sparc Solaris 10

2010-10-21 Thread KevinJin
Hi All, Trying to upgrade the Kamailio to the latest 3.1 version, but got the issue below when compile it, any help is appreciated. AppSer01:root@/usr/local/src/kamailio-3.1.0/kamailio$ gmake Q=0 all Makefile.defs defs skipped Makefile.defs defs skipped gmake[1]: Entering directory

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1 compile issue on Sparc Solaris 10

2010-10-21 Thread Huy Nguyen
Hi Kevin, Please check whether mysql was running on your server ? Regards, Huy Nguyen www.htk-inc.com From: kevin@hotmail.com To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:15:22 +0800 Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1 compile issue on Sparc Solaris 10 Hi All,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1 compile issue on Sparc Solaris 10

2010-10-21 Thread Huy Nguyen
Hi Kevin, Test with command: netstat -ntulp Can you access to mysql ? mysql -u username -ppassword Remove mysql and db_mysql from exclude_modules in file modules.lst and compile again Regards, Huy Nguyen www.htk-inc.com From: kevin@hotmail.com To: huy_quocngu...@live.com;