I am appreciating this email thread.
It is really hard to “sell” the features ala carte. They need to be bundled
into reference packages. This you know.
> The wisps totally got it with fq codel and cake arriving native for mikeotiks
> entire product line and much of ubnts gear prior to that.
I wish I had gone to the 802.11wg more regularly than I did. I only
gave one bloat related presentation in 2014, shipped the
make-wifi-fast code in 2016(?), and never went back. IETF ate all my
money and time. I just assumed they were all in the slipstream of
linux and openwrt. :/
I did have a
Sometimes I look at this old document and dream about what might have been.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:37 PM Dave Taht wrote:
>
>
> A genesis point for the creation of this email list was this failed, too
> ambitious, and too multi-faceted, project proposal from over 2 years back.
> See and
Let's split this thread and use this message to continue the discussion of L4S.
Thanks
> On May 8, 2024, at 5:31 AM, David Fernández via Starlink
> wrote:
>
> I see that L4S is not really solving everything (I read about issues with
> Wi-Fi), although it seems to be a step in the right
I see that L4S is not really solving everything (I read about issues with
Wi-Fi), although it seems to be a step in the right direction, to be
improved, let's hope.
At least, Nokia is implementing it in its network gear (for mobile
operators), so the bufferbloat problem is somehow acknowledged by
Sorry - I meant ~ 4,5 % of the ISPs, not 2 :)
All the best,
Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.bor...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 9:58 AM
Just to add the latest numbers from our (LibreQoS) ongoing "QoE competitive
landscape research":
Out of 66k plus ISPs worldwide, barely 3k use some QoE middle-box. Preseem
is the market leader, with well over 400 T2 & T3 ISPs (number shared in
their wonderful Fixed Wireless Network Report 2024 Q1