Let's split this thread and use this message to continue the discussion of L4S.
Thanks
> On May 8, 2024, at 5:31 AM, David Fernández via Starlink
> wrote:
>
> I see that L4S is not really solving everything (I read about issues with
> Wi-Fi), although it seems to be a step in the right
Hi Gene,
> On May 6, 2024, at 8:38 PM, Eugene Y Chang wrote:
>
> It seems like you signed off on this challenge. Don’t do that. Help give me
> the tools to push this to the next level.
Not at all - I'm definitely signed up for this. But I collected all these
points so we can be clear-eyed
Thanks! I just posted to:
https://randomneuronsfiring.com/all-the-reasons-that-bufferbloat-isnt-a-problem/
It has mild edits from the original to address a broader audience. Also posted
to the bloat list.
Rich
> On May 6, 2024, at 3:05 PM, Frantisek Borsik
> wrote:
>
> Hey Rich,
>
>
Hi Gene,
I've been vacillating on whether to send this note, but have decided to pull
the trigger. I apologize in advance for the "Debbie Downer" nature of this
message. I also apologize for any errors, omissions, or over-simplifications of
the "birth of bufferbloat" story and its fixes.
> On Apr 30, 2024, at 6:10 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> I think that the starlink results will create competitive pressure on the
> landline ISPs (and starlink will continue their rapid growth, being that they
> drop their next hop direct into multiple cdns).
Of course, it's important to
Thank you Jonathan for this clear description of the issues and their history.
I wonder if there's a fourth one - privacy.
Rosenworcel's talk https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-397257A1.pdf
also points out that ISPs might want to monetize our traffic patterns and
location data. (This
> On Mar 29, 2023, at 1:13 PM, David Lang via Starlink
> wrote:
>
> The problem is that laying cable (or provisioning wifi access to cover the
> area) is expensive, and if you try to have multiple different companies doing
> it, they each need a minimum density of users to make it worth
> On Mar 21, 2023, at 1:21 AM, Frantisek Borsik via Rpm
> wrote:
>
> Now, I hope to really piss You off with the following statement :-P but:
>
> even sub 5/1 Mbps “broadband” in Africa with bufferbloat fixed on as many
> hops along the internet journey from a data center to the customers
