Re: [Sts-sponsors] Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression

2020-12-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Lukasz, I think you understand the plan correctly. Here it is in bullet points: 1) Re-instate Bionic sssd 1.16.1-1ubuntu1.7 and Focal sssd 2.2.3-3ubuntu0.1 to -updates. Their [what could go wrong] still holds, as their changes are behind an opt-in configuration file option, and it has been

Re: [Sts-sponsors] Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression

2020-12-09 Thread Lukasz Zemczak
Ok, thanks for the clarification! So, if I understand correctly, we should reinstate the reverted sssd for all the series, and adcli for focal and groovy? Then for bionic accept the cyrus-sasl2 upload + possibly an adcli with the changes that were reverted? I suppose adcli would need a breaks

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression

2020-12-09 Thread Robie Basak
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors as I believe there is no longer anything to sponsor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627 Title: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression

2020-12-09 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for preparing this revert. Since Bionic 0.8.2-1ubuntu1 was previously in bionic-security, I think this revert needs to go into the security pocket, and therefore cannot be built in the bionic-updates pocket and needs handling via the security team PPA. However I'm not sure, so to avoid