Re: [Sugar-devel] site-packages vs dist-packages, was Re: ... Sugar 0.114 stable

Thanks for the patch, it has been merged. On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 01:13:49PM +0530, ANIKET MATHUR wrote: > Thanks a lot ;-).  > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 9:18 PM D. Joe <[1]sugarl...@etrumeus.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:57:57PM +0530, ANIKET MATHUR wrote: > > Hello

Re: [Sugar-devel] site-packages vs dist-packages, was Re: ... Sugar 0.114 stable

Thanks a lot ;-). On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 9:18 PM D. Joe wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:57:57PM +0530, ANIKET MATHUR wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Even after installing the toolkit for python3 I was getting the error 'No > > module named sugar3' on running "sugar-activity3 ." command.

[Sugar-devel] site-packages vs dist-packages, was Re: ... Sugar 0.114 stable

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:57:57PM +0530, ANIKET MATHUR wrote: > Hello everyone, > Even after installing the toolkit for python3 I was getting the error 'No > module named sugar3' on running "sugar-activity3 ." command. After exploring a > bit > I got to know that using the native method when I