Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

Hi, Dave I appreciate the attempt to discuss this issue. My take is that James is reflecting his view that there is no difference between Sugar and a Sugar activity - they all get built together. I am ignorant of the benefit of using Debian or Fedora packaging. The xo bundle is a zip file

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

Thanks for your questions, Dave. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:50:54PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > On 25 May 2018 at 00:47, Tony Anderson wrote: > > ASLO provides access to Sugar activities (*.xo bundles). Ways in which > users get Sugar is not relevant. > > When

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

On 25 May 2018 at 00:47, Tony Anderson wrote: > ASLO provides access to Sugar activities (*.xo bundles). Ways in which > users get Sugar is not relevant. When James said, "plenty of disk space these days to include all working activities in a build", that suggested to me

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

ASLO provides acess to Sugar activities (*.xo bundles). Ways in which users get Sugar is not relevant. In my experience, XO users install Sugar from the images on laptop.org. For Ubuntu, I assume sudo apt-get install sucrose. SOAS is not live and the usb stick is built from the SOAS image

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:56:10PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 23 May 2018 at 23:29, Walter Bender <[1]walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:26 PM Dave Crossland <[2]d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

On 23 May 2018 at 23:29, Walter Bender wrote: > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:26 PM Dave Crossland wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Tony's insistence on ASLO continues to amuse me.

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

When 'deprecated', meaning a better alternative is available. This could be ASLOv3 when it is completed, fully tested and made available In other words, not 'real soon now'. Tony On Thursday, 24 May, 2018 11:26 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:29:53PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:26 PM Dave Crossland <[1]d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > Tony's insistence on ASLO continues to amuse me.  Most

[Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron wrote: > > > > Tony's insistence on ASLO continues to amuse me. Most distribution of > activities now happens through bundles, tarballs, and GitHub. ASLO is > rarely used by distributors or indeed useful for anything except >