Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not RPMforge package

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Willis
Christoph Maser wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2009, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Dag Wieers: Good question. We do have SPEC files that still date back from before we used an automated process. I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would in fact remove the BuildRequires

Re: [suggest] package for Net::MAC perl module

2008-09-18 Thread Peter Willis
While we're talking about the retarded Red Hat perl rpm, is anyone aware that perl 5.8 as shipped with RHEL has an unpatched bug which can cause an exponential slowdown when using overloading? (This might have been adressed here already, and if so please ignore me :-X) This blog post contains

Re: [suggest] package for Net::MAC perl module

2008-09-18 Thread Peter Willis
-2008-0876.html Cu, Niels On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Willis wrote: While we're talking about the retarded Red Hat perl rpm, is anyone aware that perl 5.8 as shipped with RHEL has an unpatched bug which can cause an exponential slowdown

[suggest] perl modules with conflicting man pages

2008-06-30 Thread Peter Willis
Hi, there are a couple perl modules in rpmforge which upgrade older versions in perl core, but the perl modules have man pages which exist in perl core and prevent them from being installed. These seem to be requirements for other perl modules so it is preventing yum from installing other

[suggest] request for multiple perl modules

2008-06-18 Thread Peter Willis
I just started using rpmforge and it's minimized the packaging I need to do by a great amount. However there are still some perl modules which I need that rpmforge does not provide, so i'd like to ask if they could be added to the list of maintained packages. The version numbers might not be