On 03/21/2011 01:34 PM, Philip Durbin wrote:
I'll just keep an eye out for the build at http://packages.sw.be/members
It's there now. Thanks again, guys.
Phil
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman
On 03/12/2011 05:29 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
I've got some time to finish this spec on the train and now committed it
to the version control... hopefully it will build fine!
Yes, thank you, Yury. I see it at
http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/members/members.spec
I'll just keep an
Please consider the members package from Debian for inclusion in
RPMforge. If you would like to add it, you are welcome to base your
spec file off the one contained in this SRPM:
http://mirror.hmdc.harvard.edu/HMDC-Public/el5/SRPMS/members-20080128-5.1.HMDC.RHEL5.src.rpm
Thanks,
Phil
On Feb 28, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
Please post the SPEC separately to the list.
Please find it attached: members.spec
Thanks,
Phil
members.spec
Description: Binary data
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
The package that bit me was perl-Devel-StackTrace. There are
packages with version numbers that are sorting badly (compare
versions with dates):
See also the yum doesn't know that perl-Devel-StackTrace 1.21 1.1902
thread: http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2009-July/002586.html
Phil
On 07/01/2009 03:34 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would
in fact remove the BuildRequires altogether. So it is safe to assume
that our parser doesn't do this correctly.
Thanks for the explanation, Dag and Christoph. I'll just continue to
The version of mod_suphp available on RPMForge (0.6.2) has a known
security problem that was fixed in version 0.6.3, as described at
http://suphp.org
Could the RPMForge version of mod_suphp be updated to version 0.6.3?
Many thanks in advance,
Phil
--
Philip A. Durbin
Systems Administrator
