Re: [SunRay-Users] Failover group load balancing on servers with lots of cores

P.S.M.Swamiji wrote: On 3/16/2010 3:04 AM, William Yang wrote: Are CPU frequency and count the only things the load balance algorithm considers? It is consistent with the behaviour we're seeing: server 1, 4 core opteron 1.8GHz, 6GiB RAM, doesn't support powersaving server 2, 4 core opteron

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sunray connector and USB support for Win 2008

On 26 February 2010 10:37, CJ Keist cj.ke...@colostate.edu wrote, without getting a reply: Does anyone on this list have idea when we could expect USB redirection support for Windows Server 2008? I also would like bit of a roadmap for Windows Vista+/7 USB redirection support (and for

[SunRay-Users] Sun Ray Desktop Access Client

Is there anyway of finding what PC (IP address or hostname) running the Desktop Access Client is bound to what session in the Management Interface? Cheers, Craig This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray Desktop Access Client

On 3/16/2010 5:58 PM, Craig Hummer wrote: Is there anyway of finding what PC (IP address or hostname) running the Desktop Access Client is bound to what session in the Management Interface? From CLI, one can use utwho -ac. Thanks P.S.M.Swamiji Note: These are my personal opinions, nothing

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sunray connector and USB support for Win 2008

I don't think the FabulaTech solution can work on a Sun Ray easily as it is an ultra-thin client. The thin clients it is designed to use with are not as thin; they must run Windows, Linux, or Windows CE on the thin client device, whereas the Sun Ray runs only a firmware. William From:

Re: [SunRay-Users] Failover group load balancing on servers with lots of cores

That's an interesting point, I didn't think that CPU throttling was relevant here, but under Linux at least, that seems to be an issue because LB reads from /proc/cpuinfo. I agree that the LB algorithm would seem to need some improving, both the default automatic algorithm (possibly consider

Re: [SunRay-Users] SunRay4.2 or later on Linux Mint7.0 or 8.0

On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:29 AM, Joel Buckley wrote: Anyone have pointers on the latest cheatsheets for installing on Linux Mint7.0 or 8.0? Is Mint based on Ubuntu? I'm pretty sure it is. If it's still close enough, you might get at least most of the way there with the Ubuntu howto.

[SunRay-Users] HTML5 Video/Audio

Hello, I know that HTML5 is in draft form right now but it includes new video and audio tags which will allow for video to be played directly without the need for a video/audio player (like Flash). I bring this up only to voice my support for continued improvement around video/audio on the

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sunray connector and USB support for Win 2008

True - I wasn't suggesting that Fabula Tech's solution would work directly on a Sun-Ray - only that it is a reasonable thing to have complete USB redirection to a virtualised Windows host. I understand (perhaps I am wrong?) that USB redirection between a Sun Ray and its Solaris/Linux host is

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray Desktop Access Client

Craig, I'm not sure I understand your question: you can see session info in the utwho -ca output, which I'm sure has an analog in the GUI [I assume this is what you mean when you say Management Interface]. This includes the IP address and session ID. Scott From:

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sunray connector and USB support for Win 2008

I think the Sun USB redirector talks directly from Windows to DTU i.e. it skips the Solaris/Linux host leg for better performance; I don't think it uses the machine level for VDI. But yes, in theory it is possible for FabulaTech to work the Solaris - Windows side of the redirection. William

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray Desktop Access Client

Scott, Yes utwho -ca works fine. I cannot see where the GUI has the IP details of the client PC... but the CLI is fine. Cheers, Craig This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sunray connector and USB support for Win 2008

If it skipped Solarsi/Linux, then shouldn't all USB devices that Windows supports work from a DTU. And that is not the case. There is actually a list of supported devices./paul-Original Message- From: William Yang Sent: Mar 16, 2010 12:10 PM To: 'SunRay-Users mailing

[SunRay-Users] utconfig libgdbm.so.3 error on RHEL5.3 and SRSS 4.2

We originally attempted to install on RHEL5.4 but where told by Sun it wasn't supported so we installed RHEL5.3 on our servers instead. Coincidently Red Hat tell us they don't support libgdbm.so.3 They're Sun Fire x4140 servers Anyways when we run utconfig we get an error. This occurs on

Re: [SunRay-Users] Sunray connector and USB support for Win 2008

As far as I understand it, what actually happens is this: · The Sun Ray DTU and its corresponding SRSS talk to each other using ALP. · The USB devices’ connectivity is handled between the Solaris/Redhat/Whatever server and the DTU by encapsulating the USB communication

Re: [SunRay-Users] utconfig libgdbm.so.3 error on RHEL5.3 and SRSS 4.2

I found this old link from SRSS 3.1.1 and RHEL4 http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5107591 I did the: ln -s /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.2 /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.3 I can run utconfig now without the error. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Aaron Wilson aa...@ernieball.com wrote: We originally