Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-12-03 Thread David Schultz
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 17:06:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: IMHO this option should be removed and rm(1) should fail when a user is trying to use it. No, this is a

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-11-02 Thread Ken Smith
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 01:40 +, Alexander Best wrote: how about a compromise then? let's leave the -P switch in rm, but make it a no op! in addition to that add a new rm(1) entry explaining what the -P switch did and why exactly it was turned into a no op. let's be really eloborate on this

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-11-01 Thread Ken Smith
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:11 +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 17:06:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:21:28AM +, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 09:21:27 2010 New Revision: 214596 URL:

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-11-01 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Nov 1 10, Ken Smith wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:11 +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 17:06:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:21:28AM +, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 09:21:27 2010 New

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-11-01 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon Nov  1 10, Ken Smith wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:11 +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 17:06:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:21:28AM +, Ulrich Spoerlein

svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-10-31 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 09:21:27 2010 New Revision: 214596 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214596 Log: Elaborate some more on the non-security implications of using -P Submitted by: delphij Discussion at:svn-src-all Modified: head/bin/rm/rm.1 Modified:

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-10-31 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Oct 31 10, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 09:21:27 2010 New Revision: 214596 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214596 Log: Elaborate some more on the non-security implications of using -P thanks a lot. i think there are a few typos though (see

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-10-31 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:21:28AM +, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 09:21:27 2010 New Revision: 214596 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214596 Log: Elaborate some more on the non-security implications of using -P [...] +.Pp +N.B.: The +.Fl P +flag

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-10-31 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Oct 31 10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:21:28AM +, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 09:21:27 2010 New Revision: 214596 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214596 Log: Elaborate some more on the non-security

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-10-31 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 17:06:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: IMHO this option should be removed and rm(1) should fail when a user is trying to use it. No, this is a POLA violation for no apparent gain. The flag has been

Re: svn commit: r214596 - head/bin/rm

2010-10-31 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 20:50:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 31.10.2010 at 17:06:03 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: IMHO this option should be removed and rm(1) should fail when a user is trying to use it.