Re: [swift-evolution] SE-0045 status?

> On Jun 8, 2016, at 12:05 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:54 PM, Erica Sadun wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:37 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Erica Sadun via

Re: [swift-evolution] SE-0045 status?

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:54 PM, Erica Sadun wrote: > > >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:37 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >>> wrote: >>> >>> Did we ever get to a

Re: [swift-evolution] SE-0045 status?

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:37 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >> On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >> wrote: >> >> Did we ever get to a stopping point on SE-0045, with the take while / drop >> while methods? I remember we

Re: [swift-evolution] SE-0045 status?

> On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Did we ever get to a stopping point on SE-0045, with the take while / drop > while methods? I remember we were discussing using prefix / suffix and a > bunch of other names, but was the

Re: [swift-evolution] SE-0045 status?

on Mon Jun 06 2016, Erica Sadun wrote: > Did we ever get to a stopping point on SE-0045, with the take while / > drop while methods? I remember we were discussing using prefix / > suffix and a bunch of other names, but was the consensus ever fully > settled? I'm going back through the gmane

[swift-evolution] SE-0045 status?

Did we ever get to a stopping point on SE-0045, with the take while / drop while methods? I remember we were discussing using prefix / suffix and a bunch of other names, but was the consensus ever fully settled? I'm going back through the gmane archive, the SE repo, and the 5-31 dev build and