I would imagine that at this point you can do everything that Doctrine can do equally easily with Propel, and the port should be fairly straight forward. I would be very interested in such a development as well, and very available to help out.
Daniel On Aug 12, 3:02 am, Tofuwarrior <p...@clearintent.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies to apostrophe group members for cross posting. > > We have started using symfony1.4 and propel1.5 to develop our > applications and definitely no regrets but now we have have 2 choices > - port our own CMS (which is already propel and MVC but not symfony > driven) across into symfony OR take an existing symfony CMS like > apostrophe and look to develop a symfony version of it. > > We don't feel the web needs yet another CMS and apostrophe looks great > from the demo but, we don't know if what we are talking about is > feasible. We don't have any experience with Doctrine > > It would seem to make sense to do this in some way that made it so > that we could easily keep the propel 'branch' updated with the > Doctrine developments. > > What does anyone think? > > Any thoughts/guidance as to how this could be approached would be > gratefully received. > > Cheers, > > Paul -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
