[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: automatically add new user to a group
2009/5/25 Campezzi campe...@gmail.com:
Hi Fabien,
Thanks for the answer. Since the group was supposed to be added
automatically, I had the groups_list widget unset in my form. The
function you pointed me to seems to take what was stored in that
variable and link the values to the user being registered. I assume I
can get this working by making the groups_list field a hidden one and
setting the default value on the action or even on the form code
itself - then the code line you pointed out would do ther rest.
However, I'm unsure about how safe this is - couldn't an user
deliberately change the value of my hidden groups_list field in an
attempt to be added to another group, one with a different permission
set?
Hi Campezzi,
I had a same behavior in my last project. When I create a new user,
the group is automaticaly associated, there is no choice in the form.
First, I had thought about used a hidden field for goup_list, but I
didn't keep this idea. I have override the doSave method of my form.
So, my doSave method looks like this :
class backendSfGuardUserAdminForm extends BasesfGuardUserAdminForm
{
[]
/**
* (non-PHPdoc)
* @see
lib/form/doctrine/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/base/BasesfGuardUserForm#doSave()
*/
protected function doSave($con = null)
{
$isNew = $this-isNew();
if( $isNew )
{
$password = substr(md5(rand(10, 99)), 0, 8);
$this-getObject()-setPassword($password);
}
parent::doSave($con);
if( $isNew )
{
// Set the group, here customer
$group = Doctrine::getTable('sfGuardGroup')-findOneByName('customer');
$this-getObject()-link('groups', $group-getId());
}
}
[]
}
Fabien
Best Regards,
Campezzi
On May 25, 12:53 pm, FlyLM [ML] flylm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If you have always sfDoctrineGuardPlugin installed, take a look at
this file line 84 (savegroupsList method)
/lib/form/doctrine/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/base/BasesGuardUserForm.class.php
= $this-object-link('groups', array_values($link));
Fabien
2009/5/25 Campezzi campe...@gmail.com:
Hi there!
I'm getting started with sfDoctrineGuardPlugin and after doing a few
tutorials, I started to implement it in one of my projects. I have
created a registration form and embedded the Profile class form. So
far, so good - whenever a new user registers, both the sfGuardUser and
Profile objects get saved to the database and are correctly
associated.
Now, I have a users sfGuardGroup with a set of permissions (its id
is 1), and I'd like to put all members who sign up via this
registration form automatically in this group. My first idea was to
override the save() method of the Profile model to do that:
class Profile extends BaseProfile
{
public function save(Doctrine_Connection $conn = null)
{
$ret = parent::save($conn);
$relation = new sfGuardUserGroup();
$relation-user_id = $this-sf_guard_user_id;
$relation-group_id = 1;
$relation-save();
return $ret;
}
}
However, when I try to add a new user through the form I get a SQL
error:
SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry
'5-1' for key 'PRIMARY'
... where 5 is the id of the newly created sfGuardUser and 1 is the id
of the sfGuardGroup I'm trying to add the user to. Of course, I
checked the database and there are no other sfGuardUserGroup objects
with the 5-1 key combination, hence it's not a duplicate record thing.
I tried searching around, but found nothing about this error other
than a few complaints about the save() method not being called on
objects saved through embedded forms. It seems that is the issue here
- I'm trying to create a many-to-many relation, but the user is not
yet saved to the database when I try saving the relation, so the
database throws an error because I'm adding a reference to an object
that does not exist. However, if that is really the problem, isn't it
weird that my profile actually has its sf_guard_user_id property set?!
So, the 64.5 million dollar question: how do I get this to act like I
expect it to do? :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Routing-Rules: use sf_format only as an optional value
Hi everybody,
I'm using different routes for my application, which also determine
the response format (xml or json for an REST-based web service).
This is an example rule in routing.yml:
user_me:
url: /user/me.:sf_format
params: { module: user, action: getUserMe }
requirements: { sf_method: GET, sf_format: (?:xml|json) }
Is there a way to set sf_format to XML if NO .xml|json is given in the
URL (the Suffix should be optional)? So that this ressource can be
called via the following URLs:
(1) /user/me.xml - XML-Response
(2) /user/me.json - JSON-Response
(3) /user/me - XML-Response
Actually, a 404 is raised by symfony if the ressource is called via
(3).
Thanks for your help in advance,
Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Routing-Rules: use sf_format only as an optional value
This is how it's done in jobeet, day 15:
// apps/frontend/config/routing.yml
category:
url: /category/:slug.:sf_format
class: sfPropelRoute
param: { module: category, action: show, sf_format: html }
options: { model: JobeetCategory, type: object }
requirements:
sf_format: (?:html|atom)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:04, halla dha.maili...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using different routes for my application, which also determine
the response format (xml or json for an REST-based web service).
This is an example rule in routing.yml:
user_me:
url: /user/me.:sf_format
params: { module: user, action: getUserMe }
requirements: { sf_method: GET, sf_format: (?:xml|json) }
Is there a way to set sf_format to XML if NO .xml|json is given in the
URL (the Suffix should be optional)? So that this ressource can be
called via the following URLs:
(1) /user/me.xml - XML-Response
(2) /user/me.json - JSON-Response
(3) /user/me - XML-Response
Actually, a 404 is raised by symfony if the ressource is called via
(3).
Thanks for your help in advance,
Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Routing-Rules: use sf_format only as an optional value
Yes, thats exactly the same way like I do it also :-) Except the
sfPropelRoute.
But, like I wrote: This raises a 404 if the URL is called without
suffix :-((
On 26 Mai, 12:19, Gábor Fási maerl...@gmail.com wrote:
This is how it's done in jobeet, day 15:
// apps/frontend/config/routing.yml
category:
url: /category/:slug.:sf_format
class: sfPropelRoute
param: { module: category, action: show, sf_format: html }
options: { model: JobeetCategory, type: object }
requirements:
sf_format: (?:html|atom)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:04, halla dha.maili...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using different routes for my application, which also determine
the response format (xml or json for an REST-based web service).
This is an example rule in routing.yml:
user_me:
url: /user/me.:sf_format
params: { module: user, action: getUserMe }
requirements: { sf_method: GET, sf_format: (?:xml|json) }
Is there a way to set sf_format to XML if NO .xml|json is given in the
URL (the Suffix should be optional)? So that this ressource can be
called via the following URLs:
(1) /user/me.xml - XML-Response
(2) /user/me.json - JSON-Response
(3) /user/me - XML-Response
Actually, a 404 is raised by symfony if the ressource is called via
(3).
Thanks for your help in advance,
Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Routing-Rules: use sf_format only as an optional value
No you don't, here's the difference :)
Yours: params: { module: user, action: getUserMe }
Jobeet: param: { module: category, action: show, sf_format: html }
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:32, halla dha.maili...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, thats exactly the same way like I do it also :-) Except the
sfPropelRoute.
But, like I wrote: This raises a 404 if the URL is called without
suffix :-((
On 26 Mai, 12:19, Gábor Fási maerl...@gmail.com wrote:
This is how it's done in jobeet, day 15:
// apps/frontend/config/routing.yml
category:
url: /category/:slug.:sf_format
class: sfPropelRoute
param: { module: category, action: show, sf_format: html }
options: { model: JobeetCategory, type: object }
requirements:
sf_format: (?:html|atom)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:04, halla dha.maili...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using different routes for my application, which also determine
the response format (xml or json for an REST-based web service).
This is an example rule in routing.yml:
user_me:
url: /user/me.:sf_format
params: { module: user, action: getUserMe }
requirements: { sf_method: GET, sf_format: (?:xml|json) }
Is there a way to set sf_format to XML if NO .xml|json is given in the
URL (the Suffix should be optional)? So that this ressource can be
called via the following URLs:
(1) /user/me.xml - XML-Response
(2) /user/me.json - JSON-Response
(3) /user/me - XML-Response
Actually, a 404 is raised by symfony if the ressource is called via
(3).
Thanks for your help in advance,
Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Routing-Rules: use sf_format only as an optional value
No you don't, here's the difference :)
Yours: params: { module: user, action: getUserMe }
Jobeet: param: { module: category, action: show, sf_format: html }
Sometimes small things can make a big difference :-)
You're right - now it works great...!!
Thank you very much, Gábor :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Task generate-admin is not defined.
hai I m trying to run this command php symfony propel:generate-admin backend RoomBooking -- module=home for my backend application for admin generator where RoomBooking is my propel object. when i run this command i get the Error Task generate-admin is not defined. i dont know whats the problem .pls somebody help me out of it. thanks vikaash --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: The route x does not exist
Humm... I got it... I'm using synfony 1.0 :-( But I'll verify my links, thanks a lot! Giselle On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Frank Stelzer d...@bleedingmoon.de wrote: This happens after the latest routing changes, i think. I still have to fight against those changes for myself, too :P Example: = sf 1.1(?) link_to( 'Some cool news', 'news' ); -- would have generate a link to: news/index or only news sf 1.2 link_to( 'Some cool news', 'news' );// same like link_to( 'Some cool news', '@news' );/ -- This assumes, that you want to call the news route and the routing searches for it and throws your mentioned error. fix: link_to( 'Some cool news', 'news/index' ); This would generate the link like in the first example. Frank Am 25.05.2009 um 21:43 schrieb gisellec: I've got this error in apache error log file: apache_www_error: [Fri May 22 12:26:19 2009] [error] [client --- The route news does not exist. Well this is true because I really don't have this route in my routing files. I have a module called news, so I don't understand how this error happens. The biggest problem is that it just happened once. I can't reproduce. But I still have to justify this error... Any suggestion? -- *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ Giselle Cantador Software Engineer CiT - CMMI 5 and Beyond *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, contém informações legais privilegiadas e/ou confidenciais, não podendo ser retransmitida, arquivada, divulgada ou copiada sem autorização do remetente. Caso tenha recebido esta mensagem por engano, por favor informe o remetente respondendo imediatamente a este e-mail, e em seguida apague-a do seu computador. The information contained in this email message, including any attachment, is privileged and/or confidential. This message may not be retransmitted, archived, disclosed or copied without sender’s approval. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Task generate-admin is not defined.
Hi, Symfony 1.1 has the following Initiating an Administration Module With symfony, you build an administration on a per-module basis. A module is generated based on a Propel object using the propel:init-admin task: php symfony propel:init-admin backend article Article Thanks Deepak On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Vikaash vikaash...@gmail.com wrote: hai I m trying to run this command php symfony propel:generate-admin backend RoomBooking -- module=home for my backend application for admin generator where RoomBooking is my propel object. when i run this command i get the Error Task generate-admin is not defined. i dont know whats the problem .pls somebody help me out of it. thanks vikaash --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: ExtJs JSON response
Hi, There are pretty useful ff extension to view JSON response: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10869 Tonio https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10869 On May 25, 3:20 pm, Lee Bolding l...@leesbian.net wrote: This is the correct solution. Your browser attempts to download the response as a file because it doesn't know what to do with the mime type application/json If you set the headers to text/html for testing purposes you'll see the response as plain text in your browser On 25 May 2009, at 06:00, Leon van der Ree wrote: My guess is your content-type. Try keeping it text/html instead of application/json On May 25, 10:21 am, santail nikolai.muh...@gmail.com wrote: Action executes of file upload. If that helps to find a bug. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] sfDoctrineGuard: Problem with an Equal Nest Relation in the Admin-Backend
Hi everybody,
I'm using the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin, for which I added an Equal Nest
Relation [1] in the sfGuardUser-Table Definition:
# this is added to the sfGuardUser-Table Definition
relations:
Relationships:
class: sfGuardUser
local: user1
foreign: user2
refClass: Relationships
equal: true
This is the Definition of the Relationships-Table:
Relationships:
columns:
user1: { type: integer(4), primary: true }
user2: { type: integer(4), primary: true }
type: { type: enum, length: 24, values: [friend,blocked] }
Looks quite right to me :-)
But now I've a problem with the Admin-Backend... When trying to create
or edit (list-View works fine) a User in the Backend, I'm receiving an
error-message:
SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column
'relationships.id' in 'field list'
Does anybody know what I can do to fix this?
Thank you in advance for any help
Daniel
==
[1]http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation/manual/1_1/en/
defining-models#relationships:join-table-associations:self-referencing-
nest-relations:equal-nest-relations
(this is the default Admin-Generator generator.yml-File I'm currently
using)
generator:
class: sfDoctrineGenerator
param:
model_class: sfGuardUser
theme: admin
non_verbose_templates: true
with_show: false
singular: ~
plural:~
route_prefix: sf_guard_user
with_doctrine_route: 1
config:
fields:
password_again: { label: Password (again) }
list:
title: User list
display: [=username, created_at, updated_at, last_login]
form:
class: sfGuardUserAdminForm
display:
NONE: [username, password,
password_again]
Permissions and groups: [is_active, is_super_admin,
groups_list, permissions_list]
edit:
title: Editing User %%username%%
new:
title: New User
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: automatically add new user to a group
Thanks Fabien, that's exactly what I wanted! I just didn't know
exactly which method to override. I'm still finding my way around
symfony ;)
Cheers!
Best Regards,
Campezzi
On May 26, 6:09 am, FlyLM [ML] flylm...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/25 Campezzi campe...@gmail.com:
Hi Fabien,
Thanks for the answer. Since the group was supposed to be added
automatically, I had the groups_list widget unset in my form. The
function you pointed me to seems to take what was stored in that
variable and link the values to the user being registered. I assume I
can get this working by making the groups_list field a hidden one and
setting the default value on the action or even on the form code
itself - then the code line you pointed out would do ther rest.
However, I'm unsure about how safe this is - couldn't an user
deliberately change the value of my hidden groups_list field in an
attempt to be added to another group, one with a different permission
set?
Hi Campezzi,
I had a same behavior in my last project. When I create a new user,
the group is automaticaly associated, there is no choice in the form.
First, I had thought about used a hidden field for goup_list, but I
didn't keep this idea. I have override the doSave method of my form.
So, my doSave method looks like this :
class backendSfGuardUserAdminForm extends BasesfGuardUserAdminForm
{
[]
/**
* (non-PHPdoc)
* @see
lib/form/doctrine/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/base/BasesfGuardUserForm#doSave()
*/
protected function doSave($con = null)
{
$isNew = $this-isNew();
if( $isNew )
{
$password = substr(md5(rand(10, 99)), 0, 8);
$this-getObject()-setPassword($password);
}
parent::doSave($con);
if( $isNew )
{
// Set the group, here customer
$group = Doctrine::getTable('sfGuardGroup')-findOneByName('customer');
$this-getObject()-link('groups', $group-getId());
}
}
[]
}
Fabien
Best Regards,
Campezzi
On May 25, 12:53 pm, FlyLM [ML] flylm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If you have always sfDoctrineGuardPlugin installed, take a look at
this file line 84 (savegroupsList method)
/lib/form/doctrine/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/base/BasesGuardUserForm.class.php
= $this-object-link('groups', array_values($link));
Fabien
2009/5/25 Campezzi campe...@gmail.com:
Hi there!
I'm getting started with sfDoctrineGuardPlugin and after doing a few
tutorials, I started to implement it in one of my projects. I have
created a registration form and embedded the Profile class form. So
far, so good - whenever a new user registers, both the sfGuardUser and
Profile objects get saved to the database and are correctly
associated.
Now, I have a users sfGuardGroup with a set of permissions (its id
is 1), and I'd like to put all members who sign up via this
registration form automatically in this group. My first idea was to
override the save() method of the Profile model to do that:
class Profile extends BaseProfile
{
public function save(Doctrine_Connection $conn = null)
{
$ret = parent::save($conn);
$relation = new sfGuardUserGroup();
$relation-user_id = $this-sf_guard_user_id;
$relation-group_id = 1;
$relation-save();
return $ret;
}
}
However, when I try to add a new user through the form I get a SQL
error:
SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry
'5-1' for key 'PRIMARY'
... where 5 is the id of the newly created sfGuardUser and 1 is the id
of the sfGuardGroup I'm trying to add the user to. Of course, I
checked the database and there are no other sfGuardUserGroup objects
with the 5-1 key combination, hence it's not a duplicate record thing.
I tried searching around, but found nothing about this error other
than a few complaints about the save() method not being called on
objects saved through embedded forms. It seems that is the issue here
- I'm trying to create a many-to-many relation, but the user is not
yet saved to the database when I try saving the relation, so the
database throws an error because I'm adding a reference to an object
that does not exist. However, if that is really the problem, isn't it
weird that my profile actually has its sf_guard_user_id property set?!
So, the 64.5 million dollar question: how do I get this to act like I
expect it to do? :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
[symfony-users] Re: Many sites using the same application
I casually create centralized applications. Put in the folder WEB systems available thus gain a high rate of reuse of classes and specific functions. In addition, clear framework to keep my updated. But the architecture of symfony is perfect and allows you to make extensions or even mix the two architectures. On 22 abr, 16:48, Rafael Vieira rafael.vie...@malapronta.com.br wrote: Nei and all, About this kind of architecture, what do you guys think its the best option: a) Create a centralized application, shared by many websites or b) Create many applications, one for each website (and all the sites are the same, with some css customization and different content)? What you guys think its the best choice? We know that both formats have its pros and cons but we're in doubt about wich way to take. Any ideas? Rafael Vieira On 15 abr, 19:03, Nei Rauni Santos nra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Anyone here already created a Symfony's project where the frontend application is shared by many websites?? I would be happy if you could share this experience with me. I need to recreate an application like this and I'm thinking to do this in the following way: - I already has a table called cms.sites.. table: cms.sites columns: id, name, url, css, js, created_at, updated_at my frontend: - an application frontend - a module home I have a filter where it gets the url of request and consult the table sites to get info about it, like js, css my server: www.example1.com.br server: host.test.com document_root: /home/example1/site www.example2.com.br server: host.test.com document_root: /home/example2/site www.example3.com.br server: host.test.com document_root: /home/example3/site some details: - some directories like js, images and css have a symbolic link to the same centralized directory. - I have an other application called admin installed in another place where I use it to manage the database and to configure the frontends. Some doubts are: - How is the better way to structure the project? - Is it better to configure each domain with its own document_root or to point all domains to the same document_root? some domains has more traffic than others. So, I need that to work fine because if one fail all them will also fail. Regards, NeiRauniSantoshttp://blog.inuar.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Forms and post validators
Hi everybody I'd like to know if it's possible to determine if a form has errors when processing post validation. The purpose is to have a conditional postValidator, which is launched only if the classical validations passed. Here is a small sample of what i'd like to have (http://pastie.org/ 490290), but it doesn't work as the hasErrors() method always return false. Thank's in advance. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: How to access the object of an embedded form
Perfect! Works like a charm. Looking forward to sf1.3 to get rid of the
need for the work-around.
Tom Haskins-Vaughan wrote:
Thanks, esion. I'll give it a go and let you know how I get on.
esion wrote:
Hi,
First, I'm not sure that works :
?php foreach($form as $cartItemForm): ?
tr
td?php echo $cartItemForm['quantity']-renderLabel() ?/
td
td?php echo $cartItemForm['quantity'] ?/td
td/td
/tr
?php endforeach; ?
It doesn't match with what you wrote in your form, what do you have in
your action file?
You should have in your view something like that :
?php foreach($form-getEmbeddedForms() as $cartItemForm): ?
tr
td colspan=2?php echo $cartItemForm ?/td
/tr
?php enforeach ?
Second (this is a really special gift, I spend several weeks to find
this tricks on the net, so I'm waiting for sf1.3
http://trac.symfony-project.org/ticket/5264)
If you want to design your embedded forms you should use this code in
the foreach :
$nameFormat = $form-getWidgetSchema()-generateName($name) .
'[%s]';
$cartItemForm-getWidgetSchema()-setNameFormat($nameFormat);
else the name used in fields will be the same, then the form can't
work.
Then you have now your array of sfForm, you can get the embedded forms
of the embedded form.
$cartItemForm-getEmbeddedForms()
On May 21, 8:33 pm, Tom Haskins-Vaughan t...@templestreetmedia.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have successfully embedded a form like so:
class CartForm extends BaseCartForm
{
public function configure()
{
unset(
$this['id'],
$this['is_default'],
$this['buyer_id']
);
foreach($this-getObject()-getCartItems() as $cartItem)
{
$this-embedForm(
'cartitem_'.$cartItem-cart_id.'_'.$cartItem-harvest_id,
new CartItemForm($cartItem)
);
}
}
}
And I have managed to display it like so:
form method=post action=?php echo url_for('@my_cart') ?
tbody
?php foreach($form as $cartItemForm): ?
tr
td?php echo $cartItemForm['quantity']-renderLabel() ?/td
td?php echo $cartItemForm['quantity'] ?/td
td/td
/tr
?php endforeach; ?
/tbody
/table
input type=submit value=Update cart /
/form
But I need to access some more information about each CartItem to
display in the form, such as the Producer
($cartItem-Harvest-Producer). But in my example, it seems that
$cartItemForm is not an sfForm but a sfFormField. So how do I access the
Object of a form from a form field?
Any help much appreciated.
Thanks
Tom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Database already exists and is populated
Yes, All of you are truly right!!... Thank you! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] functional tests for security
How do I build a functional test that checks to see that I'm locked out of a secure page? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Detecting required fields
Thanks! On May 21, 1:04 pm, gimler gordon.fra...@web.de wrote: http://blog.nevalon.de/en/wie-kann-ich-alle-formular-pflichtfelder-mi... greetings Gimler On May 21, 6:17 pm, Steve the Canuck steve.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there an easy way to determine if a field isrequiredprior to rendering it? I'd like to render it with an * beside the label tag if it isrequired. I don't see a method like isRequired() built into the sfForm class, but I was wondering if anyone has a solution for this? If not, I will probably just create a helper to do this. Thanks Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
