Feb 1, 2020, 00:49 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> I've now added them with the more explicit tag 'request_stop=yes'.
>
BTW, I just created wiki page for this tag at it appeared to be undocumented
and it
seems to have no competing versions:
On 01/02/2020 00:05, Martin Wynne wrote:
> The traditional distinction was that Halts were unstaffed.
Interesting - I didn't know this, but there's so many of these today that
it shouldn't be the only determining factor.
On 31/01/2020 23:49, Dave F wrote:
> Over the past few months I've been
On 01/02/2020 00:05, Martin Wynne wrote:
The traditional distinction was that Halts were unstaffed.
These are now classed as DfT F, which is also worth adding.
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
The traditional distinction was that Halts were unstaffed.
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi
Over the past few months I've been sorting & adding detail to the UK's
National Rail railway stations so that OSM has the correct amount.
I'm unsure of the benefits of tagging some of them as 'halts'. I'm
proposing they should all be 'station'.
All 2567 NR Stations with 96 halts in blue:
On 31/01/2020 20:07, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
But that's not a parking spot. Because a vehicle just happens to be
there, it doesn't make it one. By your logic we should be tagging
pavements as such, because lazy drivers think they're entitled to break
the law.
But that was my whole point.
On 31/01/2020 11:41, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 31/01/2020 11:13, ael wrote:
OK. I agree that parking=layby is much better.
Thanks for the comments.
But the places I was asking about can't really be called laybys, or
car parks. Somewhere that a car could be left for a few hours out of
On 31/01/2020 11:41, Martin Wynne wrote:
But the places I was asking about can't really be called laybys, or
car parks. Somewhere that a car could be left for a few hours out of
anyone's way on an otherwise long narrow lane:
https://goo.gl/maps/nSTAbnE4nYXTBAz59
That's a really good
On 31/01/2020 12:24, Andy G Wood wrote:
For me the most logical is amenity=parking as a node.
But "amenity" suggests something specifically provided for the purpose?
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On Friday, 31 January 2020 11:41:41 GMT Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 31/01/2020 11:13, ael wrote:
> > OK. I agree that parking=layby is much better.
>
> Thanks for the comments.
> But the places I was asking about can't really be called laybys, or car
> parks. Somewhere that a car could be left for a
On 31/01/2020 11:13, ael wrote:
OK. I agree that parking=layby is much better.
Thanks for the comments.
But the places I was asking about can't really be called laybys, or car
parks. Somewhere that a car could be left for a few hours out of
anyone's way on an otherwise long narrow lane:
11 matches
Mail list logo
