Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-05 Thread Paula Stern (WritePoint Ltd.)
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lisa Gielczyk (TCP ADMIN) Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 8:05 PM To: Sue Heim Cc: tcp@techcommpros.com Subject: Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction) This list's function, actually, is for people to get answers to tech comm questions. STC

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-05 Thread Lisa Gielczyk (TCP ADMIN)
Hi Paula, I don't remember TECHWR-L being discussed on TCP much at the beginning, and I couldn't find it in the archives. I did find the posts where people were making reference to a split and shared custody and such, to which I responded: Just for the record, this parent won't allow bad-talk

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Gene Kim-Eng
@techcommpros.com Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction) Lisa, I subscribe to this list to discuss issues. I do not read blogs to discuss issues. If you are flat out saying do not discuss STC here, then I think I may

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Sue Heim
Well, maybe. Except, I hate blogs and rarely, if ever, read 'em. If it's OK for a blog, why is it not OK for a discussion list? ...sue On 1/4/08, Lisa Gielczyk (TCP ADMIN) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the kind of stuff that needs to go in the blogs on the site, not on the list. Would

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Lisa Gielczyk (TCP ADMIN)
This is the kind of stuff that needs to go in the blogs on the site, not on the list. Would one of the people from the Lone Writers list be willing to start a blog and put this information there, and then refer the list members to the blog? Thanks, Lisa G. On Jan 4, 2008 11:32 AM, Sue Heim

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Sue Heim
Resending, since it didn't appear this went thru... Odd. On 1/4/08, Sue Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I'm curious... What's going on? This is not the first we've seen of folks coming here from STC lately (in one form or another). Are you all not renewing your memberships? Why? I'm

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Bill Swallow
Speaking from my own experience, things are a bit wonky with the STC right now. Good people trying to do good things, but administrivia seems to get in the way, and there seems to be a disconnect between Society goals and Staff initiatives. I do hope that last bit gets sorted out. I know a few

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Lisa Gielczyk (TCP ADMIN)
I'm going to answer both Bill and Sue at the same time. There have only been two times that I've seen a mass exodus of people unsubscribing from the TCP list, and both times, it was because people were hashing out STC issues. I want to provide a place where people can talk about STC and other

Re: [TCP] STC Refugees (was Re: New User Introduction)

2008-01-04 Thread Bill Swallow
Sounds fair, thanks for the explanation. So I guess if someone who recently left wants to write up a short blog about it on the TCP site, we should start up a comments thread. On Jan 4, 2008 12:52 PM, Lisa Gielczyk (TCP ADMIN) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There have only been two times that I've