Re: libcbor v0.10.0

2022-12-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/12/30 02:06, Theo Buehler wrote: > I understand that it is a libcbor major bump. Why is the libfido2 bump > needed? We can run into a problem with bumps with inter-library dependencies in base. If software from packages uses functions from both libraries, if you _don't_ bump major for

Re: libcbor v0.10.0

2022-12-29 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:41:59PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2022, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:09:16AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > > > This updates libcbor to upstream version v.0.10.0. This version includes > > > clang15 header fixes and fixes a few

Re: libcbor v0.10.0

2022-12-29 Thread Damien Miller
On Fri, 30 Dec 2022, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:09:16AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > > This updates libcbor to upstream version v.0.10.0. This version includes > > clang15 header fixes and fixes a few memory leaks. Full release notes > > are at

Re: libcbor v0.10.0

2022-12-29 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:09:16AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > This updates libcbor to upstream version v.0.10.0. This version includes > clang15 header fixes and fixes a few memory leaks. Full release notes > are at https://github.com/PJK/libcbor/releases/tag/v0.10.0 I understand that it is a