Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-02-01 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
Hi, On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 21:32:29 +0300 Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:00:13PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> ... >> >> But I think we should keep the part since it is needed when adding a >> tunneling protocol which is not supported by pipex, or running npppd >> on

Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-02-01 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:00:13PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: > Hi > > ... > > But I think we should keep the part since it is needed when adding a > tunneling protocol which is not supported by pipex, or running npppd > on another OS. > > >> If having "pipex yes/no" configuration is

Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-02-01 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
I'm sorry for sending 2 mails. First one was a draft. Please read second one.

Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-02-01 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
Hi On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:30:43 +0300 Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300 >> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: >> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I >> > found

Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-02-01 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:30:43 +0300 Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300 >> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: >> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I >> > found

Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-01-31 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300 > Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I > > found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in > > npppd.conf,

Re: npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-01-30 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
Hi, On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300 Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I > found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in > npppd.conf, but successfully connects the client. So packets don't flow. > However, the

npppd(8): remove "pipex" option

2023-01-29 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
Hi, While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in npppd.conf, but successfully connects the client. So packets don't flow. However, the pppac(4) has no this problem, because corresponding pppac interface always