Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-21 Thread zdenko podobny
did you managed to build training tools? Zdenko On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Simon Eigeldinger simon.eigeldin...@vol.at wrote: Hi, i hope it worked. here's a binary to test for people who want to see if everything works fine: http://domasofan.spdns.eu/tesseract/ There are some

Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-21 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Not to mention the data corruption problem on stdout. Maybe wait another week or two for anything else to come up, and then declare 3.04.01? (Just to be clear, it doesn't matter from Debian's perspective; the stdout fix has already been patched there.) -- You received this message because you

Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-21 Thread Simon Eigeldinger
Hi, i hope it worked. here's a binary to test for people who want to see if everything works fine: http://domasofan.spdns.eu/tesseract/ There are some files over there. they are all self extracting archives and you can extract them all in the wanted directory. the subdirectories will be

Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-21 Thread ShreeDevi Kumar
Maybe tag is the wrong word. I wanted to know if someone wanted to download a 3.04.00 version that works with Cygwin how would they access it. - sent from my phone. excuse the brevity On 21 Jul 2015 11:14, zdenko podobny zde...@gmail.com wrote: I do not understand - this is standard fix/commit

Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-21 Thread zdenko podobny
git pull ;-) or download master from github.com... Zdenko On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, ShreeDevi Kumar shreesh...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe tag is the wrong word. I wanted to know if someone wanted to download a 3.04.00 version that works with Cygwin how would they access it. - sent

Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-21 Thread Jim O'Regan
On 21 July 2015 at 06:43, zdenko podobny zde...@gmail.com wrote: I do not understand - this is standard fix/commit as any other. Why it should be tagged??? I think the question could be rephrased as Is a bugfix that re-enables compilation on Cygwin not significant enough to justify tagging it

Re: [tesseract-ocr] building tesseract on windows using cygwin

2015-07-20 Thread zdenko podobny
I do not understand - this is standard fix/commit as any other. Why it should be tagged??? Zdenko On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:44 AM, ShreeDevi Kumar shreesh...@gmail.com wrote: Zdenko, How is this update tagged? Is there a version number with it for future ref. - sent from my phone. excuse