On 05/20/2011 04:34 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 05/19/2011 10:33 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
$ rpm -qf /sbin/btrfsck
btrfs-progs-0.19-13.fc15.x86_64
facepalm/
Is there a reason that package doesn't provide a fsck.btrfs symlink?
No idea. Try filing a RFE against that package
Rahul
--
test
Compose started at Fri May 20 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
On 05/14/2011 05:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
May 14 11:23:24 nbecker1 abrt[17229]: saved core dump of pid 17226
(/usr/libexec/colord) to
/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2011-05-14-11:23:24-17226.new/coredump (18477056 bytes)
But run abrt-gui doesn't show anything.
So 2 problems, colord dumping and
sudo service sendmail status
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Failed to connect to socket
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/private: Connection refused
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Failed to connect to socket
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/private: Connection refused
sendmailFailed to get D-Bus connection:
Hi,
Does anyone have any pointers for getting F15 beta to run as a Hyper-V virtual
guest? I was unable to get the Legacy Network Adapter to work, so I thought I
would ask before I attempt to set up an environment where I can recompile the
kernel to create the drivers/staging/hv modules.
Fred
On 05/20/2011 01:08 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
No idea. Try filing a RFE against that package
Doesn't appear to have done any good in the past.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625967
--
Ian Pilcher
On Fri May 20 10:28:21 UTC 2011 Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
It was probably running under different user then who is running the
abrt-gui so gui can't access it and doesn't show it. You can try to run
the gui as root to see all the crashes.
I had this problem too and indeed running the gui from root
On 05/20/2011 03:31 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 05/20/2011 01:08 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
No idea. Try filing a RFE against that package
Doesn't appear to have done any good in the past.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625967
I find I get better responses in bugzilla if
On 05/20/2011 04:48 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri May 20 10:28:21 UTC 2011 Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
It was probably running under different user then who is running the
abrt-gui so gui can't access it and doesn't show it. You can try to run
the gui as root to see all the crashes.
I had this
On 05/20/2011 10:57 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Also, given the triviality that you point out a patch in the bug wouldn't go
amiss I'm sure (fwiw e2fsprogs uses hardlinks for these files and dosfstools
uses symlinks).
Yeah, but it would be a one-line patch to the SPEC file. It seems like
it
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:08 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 05/20/2011 10:57 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Also, given the triviality that you point out a patch in the bug wouldn't go
amiss I'm sure (fwiw e2fsprogs uses hardlinks for these files and dosfstools
uses symlinks).
Yeah, but it would
On 05/20/2011 07:36 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
thanks, maybe another Power Management feature worth to note:
We have recently added support for Asus SHE (Super Hybrid Engine)
into tuned.
Do edit the wiki and add the info directly.
Rahul
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
hello,
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
cornel panceac wrote:
hello,
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
I don't know. I'm not sure why you'd want to, what do you have in
mind? Why Disabled or Permissive insufficient?
-J
--
in
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:14:13PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
hello,
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i tried,
(f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Just to ask the stupid question, are you aware that it can be turned off
at install
cornel panceac wrote:
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define remove.
If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
Disabled. If it doesn't then you should file a bug.
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
cornel panceac wrote:
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define remove.
If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
Disabled. If
On 05/20/2011 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
With the awesomeness of git-format-patch, probably not =) It's good to
get into the habit of providing spec fixes as git-formatted patches
these days, it makes it very easy on the maintainer - they can apply it
with a one-liner.
Is there any
I got a bunch of these - this kernel is the F15 2.6.38.6-27 kernel
compiled from src rpm on F14
(sorry for wrap).
Anywone else seeing any issues with iwlagn ? I thought a bunch of fixes
for iwlagn went into 2.6.38.6 ?
g/
- /var/log/messages snippet ---
May 20 14:10:14 lap1
2011/5/20 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
cornel panceac wrote:
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define remove.
If you mean disable then Fedora will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:36 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
user with too many privs once who
cornel panceac wrote:
ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
selinux\* policy\*.
one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.
Side note: This thread is a great
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
cornel panceac wrote:
ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
selinux\* policy\*.
one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
cornel panceac wrote:
ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
selinux\* policy\*.
one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.
cornel panceac wrote:
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com mailto:m...@cchtml.com
cornel panceac wrote:
ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
selinux\* policy\*.
one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the
On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
cornel panceac wrote:
You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
why not?
Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
probably switch to the gentoo distro and setup
2011/5/20 Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com
On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
cornel panceac wrote:
You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
why not?
Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it
cornel panceac cpanceac at gmail.com writes:
hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Well, I just looked out the window ...
There are a couple of guys out there, with some funny head
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
ping -R seems to work here as long as the hosts you are pinging allow
it. I have found some up stream of me that do not.
As the bug report states, the issue has long since been fixed.
And did not affect Disabled.
--
spin-kickstarts-0.15.6-1.fc15 has been built with the state used for RC3.
It does not include the LXDE commit from after RC3. If a new LXDE is
built before release then we should probably do another build before
release. Same if SOAS has and ks changes before it is built. Otherwise
I'll do
It has been my understanding that anyone from QA that's present (it happened
I was the only one present for F14 final) can cast the vote (which I did, +1).
If I was wrong in this, then maybe F14 shouldn't have shipped?
I do think that having the meeting as a failsafe is a good idea.
Hey, all.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:17 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
It has been my understanding that anyone from QA that's present (it
happened
I was the only one present for F14 final) can cast the vote (which I
did, +1).
If I was wrong in this, then maybe F14 shouldn't have shipped?
No, that was fine.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 13:31 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 05/20/2011 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
With the awesomeness of git-format-patch, probably not =) It's good to
get into the habit of providing spec fixes as git-formatted patches
these days, it makes it very easy on the maintainer
On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
fedpkg co somepackage
[pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
Cloning into btrfs-progs...
The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' can't
be established.
RSA key fingerprint is
Ian Pilcher wrote:
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Do you have a fedora cert in ~/.fedora?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 05/20/2011 02:52 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
fedpkg co somepackage
[pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
Cloning into btrfs-progs...
The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' can't
be established.
RSA key fingerprint
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-4.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rssh-2.3.3-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avahi-0.6.27-6.fc14
Ian Pilcher wrote:
I'm all for making maintainers lives easier, but ...
If you are not a packager you can just do:
git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/btrfs-progs.git
fedpkg is for Fedora Packagers. :)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:59 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:52:35 -0500
Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
fedpkg co somepackage
[pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
Cloning into btrfs-progs...
The
39 matches
Mail list logo
