On 12/02/13 03:44, Beartooth wrote:
I have several machines running F18, which I would like to change
to F20 by some sort of upgrade, rather than a fresh install. Can anyone
yet guess whether upgrading from a DVD, or using fedup, or yum, or some
other way is most likely to succeed
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2013-12-04
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Well folks, we still have proposed blockers on the list, so you know
what that means: time for some more blocker review in just eight short
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 19:44 +, Beartooth wrote:
I have several machines running F18, which I would like to change
to F20 by some sort of upgrade, rather than a fresh install. Can anyone
yet guess whether upgrading from a DVD, or using fedup, or yum, or some
other way is most
Compose started at Wed Dec 4 07:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
I tested a fedup from f18--f20 and noted that some packages were not upgraded.
One, in particular, was apper.
Is this to be expected?
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 12/04/13 20:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
I tested a fedup from f18--f20 and noted that some packages were not
upgraded. One, in particular, was apper.
Is this to be expected?
Never mind. Eyes going bad. Just noticed the version of apper in current
f18 is greater than apper in f20.
--
Ed Greshko wrote:
Never mind. Eyes going bad. Just noticed the version of apper in current
f18 is greater than apper in f20.
This is a bug that the maintainer needs to fix by pushing an F20 update. Can you
file a bug for this?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi guys,
My name is Barneedhar, an undergrad student living in Chennai, India.
I have been using Fedora for the past couple of months and have been
wanting to contribute back to the community. So, I thought I might put
my hands for some QA work.
I have been using Ubuntu for more than 3 years now
On 05/12/13 06:55, Barneedhar wrote:
Hi guys,
My name is Barneedhar, an undergrad student living in Chennai, India.
I have been using Fedora for the past couple of months and have been
wanting to contribute back to the community. So, I thought I might put
my hands for some QA work.
I have been
Below are the minutes from today's Blocker Review Meeting. We made it
through all the listed blocker and freeze exception proposals. Looking
forward to the Go/No-Go Meeting tomorrow...
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review
With the Alpha release I did not notice this happening but with the Beta
release using Gnome-Shell-Extension-Taskbar v38 (set for bottom bar) the
bar will appear after logging in for a moment and then disappear. If I
do an alt-F2, r, enter the desktop will restart with the task bar
present
How do we get rid of the subject msgs? They spam an open gnome-terminal
like:
Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ...
PackageKit:get-updates transaction /4692_ccdcccba from uid 1000
finished with success after 10490ms
Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ...
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2013-12-04
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Well folks, we still have proposed blockers on the list, so you know
what that means: time for some more blocker review in just eight short
13 matches
Mail list logo
