It seems I am getting a popup msg (in the top middle of the msg it has
the topic Local system message service) with various warnings/msgs from
my log(s),and the popups appear in the top/middle of my screen, one on
top of the other. And you have to click on them to get rid of them.
How the heck
Hi all,
anybody sees this too if including the updates-testing repo to yum update:
sudo yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
Loaded plugins: langpacks
updates-testing/20/x86_64/metalink | 27 kB
00:00
updates-testing | 4.6 kB
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:41 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
anybody sees this too if including the updates-testing repo to yum update:
sudo yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
Loaded plugins: langpacks
updates-testing/20/x86_64/metalink | 27 kB
00:00
On 12/06/2013 10:45 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:41 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
anybody sees this too if including the updates-testing repo to yum update:
sudo yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
Loaded plugins: langpacks
updates-testing/20/x86_64/metalink
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 18:37 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 22:31 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
If it happened to you, Adam, as well, I wonder if it might be a bug?
Does if happen to others? Being somewhat ignorant, I thought the
problem was me and how I installed it, which
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:53:09 +0100
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/06/2013 10:45 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:41 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
anybody sees this too if including the updates-testing repo to
yum update:
sudo yum
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 11:10 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi Igor,
thank you, did help :-)
are you sure this is a problem in yum itself and not in the mirror
infrastructure?
If downgrading yum helps, then it does rather suggest yum's involved in
the problem.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:12:48 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 11:10 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi Igor,
thank you, did help :-)
are you sure this is a problem in yum itself and not in the mirror
infrastructure?
If downgrading yum helps,
On 12/06/2013 11:18 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:12:48 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 11:10 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi Igor,
thank you, did help :-)
are you sure this is a problem in yum itself and not in the mirror
infrastructure?
Le 28/11/2013 03:25, Adam Williamson a écrit :
Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order
to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-go meeting
Please consider for F20Final:
I installed quite a number of packages with the
yum that came with TC5. Plenty of complaints
about mirrors but eventually everything asked for
was installed. Seems like reasonable behavior
when the mirrors aren't widely populated.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:41:30 +0100
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
Hi all,
anybody sees this too if including the updates-testing repo to yum
update:
Happened with me but still updated.
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
test mailing list
Compose started at Fri Dec 6 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
On 06.12.2013 12:12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
I installed quite a number of packages with the
yum that came with TC5. Plenty of complaints
about mirrors but eventually everything asked for
was installed. Seems like reasonable behavior
when the mirrors aren't widely populated.
Exactly.
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close another
persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a member of the action
developer or bugzappers group close a bz, especially a non-trivial bz?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi,
Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close
another persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a
member of the action developer or bugzappers group close a bz,
especially a non-trivial bz?
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 02:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
It seems I am getting a popup msg (in the top middle of the msg it has
the topic Local system message service) with various warnings/msgs from
my log(s),and the popups appear in the top/middle of my screen, one on
top of the other. And
On 12/06/2013 03:56 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
Hi,
Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close
another persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a member of
the action developer or bugzappers group
I have just downloaded Fedora TC5 and the install went fine until I done
yum -y update and got the message there are no updates. Please advise.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work.
Prov. 3:5 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
TOP POSTING TC5 is before alfa , you mean Fedora final candidate RC5 ?
or what ever ?
when is not specific means that you are talking about pre alfa composes.
please be more specific .
Thanks,
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 09:39 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
I have just downloaded Fedora TC5 and
Tried updating Fedora 20 TC5 and this is the results: Package
systemd-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm is not signed
--
All things are workable but don't all things work.
Prov. 3:5 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Greetings.
systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night
(as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release).
However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users
will see an error about the package not being signed.
This has already been corrected and
On 12/06/2013 10:56 AM, Karel Volný wrote:
Hi,
Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close another
persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a member of the
action developer or bugzappers group
On 06.12.2013 18:31, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 12/06/2013 10:56 AM, Karel Volný wrote:
Hi,
Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close another
persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a member
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039052
and
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.4.3-120.fc20?_csrf_token=88c0eb78b5fd4d9eb03e957cc9042ad6c25c3f7c
2013/12/6 poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com:
On 06.12.2013 12:12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
I installed quite a number of
On 06.12.2013 19:37, Simon G. wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039052
and
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.4.3-120.fc20?_csrf_token=88c0eb78b5fd4d9eb03e957cc9042ad6c25c3f7c
I simply can not accept that something like yum can be broken!
And please do not
Package systemd-libs-208-9 is not signed is the error message I am
receiving in Fedora 20 TC5 install.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work.
Prov. 3:5 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net
wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038885
Closed the first time because it's not an F20 bug. As mentioned in bug 864198
it's intended behavior. Also closed because the summary about it not installing
I don't mean to be a pain in the ---, but there is only one choice of
nvidia drivers which are 304.116. Who do I report this problem to?
--
All things are workable but don't all things work.
Prov. 3:5 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Thank you for the answer to this problem.
On 12/06/2013 01:02 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
Package systemd-libs-208-9 is not signed is the error message I am
receiving in Fedora 20 TC5 install.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work.
Prov. 3:5 6
--
test mailing list
Dear all,
I believe this has been reported, but where is the workaround for this:
One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates),
and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only
safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 16:45:11 +,
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
TOP POSTING TC5 is before alfa , you mean Fedora final candidate RC5 ?
or what ever ?
when is not specific means that you are talking about pre alfa composes.
please be more specific .
Thanks,
No he means final
On 12/06/2013 03:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net
wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038885
Closed the first time because it's not an F20 bug. As mentioned in bug 864198
it's intended behavior. Also closed
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:39:26 -0700
Lawrence E Graves lgrave...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just downloaded Fedora TC5 and the install went fine until I
done yum -y update and got the message there are no updates. Please
advise.
Thats completely normal at this point.
updates-testing is disabled
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:28 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
All of the above is fine. However, your are exhibiting profound
arrogance in stepping in for real fedora managers/developers. Do your
RFEs and your own bzs, but, leave other peoples bz reports alone.
You are assuming a policy that
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
Thank you for the answer to this problem.
On 12/06/2013 01:02 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
Package systemd-libs-208-9 is not signed is the error message I am
receiving in Fedora 20 TC5 install.
The package really isn't signed.
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:10 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain in the ---, but there is only one choice of
nvidia drivers which are 304.116. Who do I report this problem to?
Given that you don't provide any
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 16:03 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 12/06/2013 03:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:28 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
All of the above is fine. However, your are exhibiting profound
arrogance in stepping in for real fedora managers/developers.
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:14 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
and engineers tend not to be fans of efficiency
over unnecessary discussion.
As you may have guessed, I trapped myself between two different drafts
of that clause :) Should read 'tend to be fans...', of course.
--
Adam Williamson
On 06.12.2013 04:48, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/05/2013 05:49 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:05 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Are there any chances to have this packages [1] for Fedora 20? I know
it's only about release number but I don't feel comfortable with
packages
On 12/06/2013 01:54 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:10 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain in the ---, but there is only one choice of
nvidia drivers which are 304.116. Who do I report this
On 12/07/13 07:04, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
On 12/06/2013 01:54 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:10 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain in the ---, but there is only one choice of
nvidia drivers
Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few
days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases.
Here's the first:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_network_smb
it's a test case for browsing SMB shares. Note that I'm fairly sure it's
On Dec 6, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
For now the test case is just sitting in the wiki, but for F21 I'm
thinking of proposing adding a set of 'optional' desktop test cases,
like we have 'optional' install test cases
It's a good idea. For what it's worth,
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few
days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases.
Here's the first:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_network_smb
wiki says:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 02:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
in the cases I recall seeing, that wasn't it. It just never showed.
It'd be a bug then. Working here:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/dejadup-de-activities.png
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 01:35 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few
days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases.
Here's the first:
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 12:45 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 02:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
in the cases I recall seeing, that wasn't it. It just never showed.
It'd be a bug then. Working here:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/dejadup-de-activities.png
Like I
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 12:45 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 02:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
in the cases I recall seeing, that wasn't it. It just never showed.
It'd be a bug then. Working
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 18:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 01:35 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few
days, and thought it'd make sense to write up
On 06.12.2013 22:22, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:14 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
and engineers tend not to be fans of efficiency
over unnecessary discussion.
As you may have guessed, I trapped myself between two different drafts
of that clause :) Should read 'tend to
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:58:41 +
From: johan...@gmail.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Who can close BZs?
On 12/06/2013 03:56 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
Hi,
Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
Is there a policy or other guidance
52 matches
Mail list logo
