So, today, we went through 1.8 testing. Results of stuff (including
installation tests of all release blocking images) that we retested are
filled to the 1.8 result pages, I don't think it's necessary to copy over
all remaining 1.4 results.
We didn't find anything broken compared to 1.4, Firefox
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 24/142 (x86_64), 3/24
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190324.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190327.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 50
Dropped packages:15
Upgraded packages: 202
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 98.57 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Reminder: the Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 30 Beta release will be
held TOMORROW, 2019-03-28 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at:
Hello everyone, I signed up for the test list. I currently use Fedora KDE
at home and at work for a year. I work as a DBA and developer of the Caché
Intersystems database and Fedora KDE fits my needs very well. Among the
projects in my work is migrating the database to a red hat server. So I
want
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:31 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> My two cents:
>
> If there's a fallback option, and if the user selects it, they
> shouldn't end up in an unambiguous state. Right now we're seeing
> systems hanging. I'd rather see a crash than a hang where the user
> can't get to a shell,
