The first send didn't seem to work; so I'm trying again.
On 12/2/19 13:43, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 12/2/19 06:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
Sounds reasonable to test both LiveOS and
Kamil,
Thanks for working on this. I am glad we are considering something
different here, as the current process is not perfect.
Personally, of the suggested options, I think that using Pagure is my
preferred option. I think of the available options, it allows for the
easiest collaboration
On 12/2/19 14:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 14:36 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
When I saw the kanban/taiga mentioned on the test list today, I thought
about a comment KParal made a while back about that there were some Test
Cases that he knew of that needed some
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:51 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
>
>
>> >The VOTE must be only +1 or -1. Indecisive people do not need to put
>> that down, they just can do nothing.
>>
>> Haha. In defense of 0, there is a long history of "abstain" votes. There
>> may be a proposal that someone doesn't
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 14:36 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> When I saw the kanban/taiga mentioned on the test list today, I thought
> about a comment KParal made a while back about that there were some Test
> Cases that he knew of that needed some updating. I'm aware of some too.
>
> It
When I saw the kanban/taiga mentioned on the test list today, I thought
about a comment KParal made a while back about that there were some Test
Cases that he knew of that needed some updating. I'm aware of some too.
It seems to me we could use the kanban to keep our test documentation up
to
On 12/2/19 06:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
Sounds reasonable to test both LiveOS and the installed system. Does it
make sense to test both installed system's reboot and poweroff, though? Are
On 12/2/19 07:03, Kamil Paral wrote:
I'm not familiar with kanban/taiga. What is the benefit over using standard
(Pagure) tickets?
The kanban/taiga is what they use at Fedora Magazine. A Writer starts by
creating an Issue proposing a new article for the magazine. There is a
back and
I want to speak up in defense of synchronous meetings. I acknowledge
that the timing is rather convenient for me personally (it's 12–3pm my
time), which makes it easier for me to see the upsides.
The big benefit is the high bandwidth discussion. I have been in
plenty of meetings where someone
Kamil,
Sure thing. I was planning to work on it today.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 12/2/19 06:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
Sounds reasonable to test both LiveOS
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:40 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > Pagure
> > ***
> >
> > This is very similar to the Bugzilla description. For each proposed
> blocker, we (auto-)create a ticket in a "fedora-blockers" project, for the
> purpose
> >The VOTE must be only +1 or -1. Indecisive people do not need to put
> that down, they just can do nothing.
>
> Haha. In defense of 0, there is a long history of "abstain" votes. There
> may be a proposal that someone doesn't support, but also doesn't want to
> stand in the way of progression,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191201.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191202.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 360.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > Sounds reasonable to test both LiveOS and the installed system. Does it
> make sense to test both installed system's reboot and poweroff, though? Are
> there any meaningful
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
16 matches
Mail list logo
