flatpak related

A post from a novice user I still do not have a firm grip on the ideology, and usage of flatpaks. I think my Xfce install is default and all additional packages are flatpaks. Today, dnf told me to get rid of org.gnome.Platform 3.32 and 3.34 and install 3.36. I am not sure if I understood

Re: a personal usage report - Rawhide Xfce

Stan, I am just trying to become as familiar with possible and to try to understand why Xfce fans still cling to Xfce. I assume Fedora ships Xfce without any tweaks. Other Xfce distros, change the menu, the panel, and add or remove apps or both. I do not think I would recommend Xfce in Fedora

Fedora-32-20200315.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200314.n.0): ID: 546101 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/546101 ID: 546166 Test: x86_64 universal

Re: a personal usage report - Rawhide Xfce

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 22:39:31 -0400 David wrote: > One question I do have for the Xfce fans, is that if you install any > Gnome packages, you end up with quite a few Gnome dependencies, in the > on your system.So is there any point to using Xfce, if you plan to > install some > Gnome apps ?

[Test-Announce] 2020-03-16 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

# F32 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-03-16 # Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Final blockers to review (and two Beta AcceptedPreviousRelease blockers to check in on), so let's have a Fedora 32 blocker review meeting

[Test-Announce] 2020-03-16 @ ** 15:00 ** UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2020-03-16 # Time: ** 15:00 ** UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We just signed off on Beta, and I figure everyone needs something to do while we all

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200315.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-32-20200314.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200315.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Testing impact of Red Hat office closure

Hi QA team, As many of you may already know, Red Hat has asked all employees to work from home[1]. Given the current global conditions, I want to start understanding the impact if Red Hat offices are closed as we approach the Fedora 32 Final (currently targeted for 21 April). What tests require

Fedora 30 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 30 Security updates need testing: Age URL 117 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-71b2273a9f libarchive-3.3.3-7.fc30 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4d232b48b8 weechat-2.7.1-1.fc30 5

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200315.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F32 Beta KDE shutdown takes too long

On 2020-03-15 16:53, Ed Greshko wrote: > In testing the just released F32 Beta in a QEMU/KVM, installed from > Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso, I find that the shutdown takes too > long.  It pauses for 1min 30seconds for a stopped job.  The journal shows. > > Mar 15 16:46:25

F32 Beta KDE shutdown takes too long

In testing the just released F32 Beta in a QEMU/KVM, installed from Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso, I find that the shutdown takes too long.  It pauses for 1min 30seconds for a stopped job.  The journal shows. Mar 15 16:46:25 f32k.greshko.com systemd[1]: spice-vdagentd.service: