phase.
>
> Is this expected?
>
> FWIW, the "Everything-netinst" install of a KDE system did install just fine
> with 1248MB assigned.
>
> Currently using...
>
> Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-33-20200824.n.0.iso
> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200824
of a KDE system did install just fine
with 1248MB assigned.
Currently using...
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-33-20200824.n.0.iso
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200824.n.0.iso
Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-33-20200824.n.0.iso
--
The key to getting good answers is t
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 15:02:45 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-08-24/fedora-qa.2020-08-24-15.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On 8/24/20 3:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:18 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote:
[Snip]
Is the "I would like to make additional space available" checkbox going
to grow subvolume support? Right now your only option is to blow away
the entire btrfs volume from a previous
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:18 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote:
>
> On 8/24/20 2:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:40 AM Alessio wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >> I was performing some random test of F33.
> >> There is a thing that I can't understand.
> >> If I reinstall the system on
On 8/24/20 2:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:40 AM Alessio wrote:
Hello.
I was performing some random test of F33.
There is a thing that I can't understand.
If I reinstall the system on an disk where I already installed Fedora
33 before, and I want to preserve the content
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:40 AM Alessio wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> > I was performing some random test of F33.
> > There is a thing that I can't understand.
> > If I reinstall the system on an disk where I already installed Fedora
> > 33
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:40 AM Alessio wrote:
>
> Hello.
> I was performing some random test of F33.
> There is a thing that I can't understand.
> If I reinstall the system on an disk where I already installed Fedora
> 33 before, and I want to preserve the content of the home subvolume, is
>
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 18/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200823.n.0):
ID: 646580 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646580
ID: 646602 Test: x86_64
OLD: Fedora-33-20200823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200824.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 116.61 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200821.0):
ID: 646510 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646510
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
ID: 646493 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646493
ID: 646494 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello.
I was performing some random test of F33.
There is a thing that I can't understand.
If I reinstall the system on an disk where I already installed Fedora
33 before, and I want to preserve the content of the home subvolume, is
this feasible? I tried various things using Anaconda, but I'm
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200823.0):
ID: 646431 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/181 (x86_64)
ID: 646258 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
16 matches
Mail list logo
