OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 262.85 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
OLD: Fedora-36-20220401.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220401.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
I just installed the F36 Workstation Beta.
Everything seems to be working just fine. I worked on some other stuff. After
a while I returned to the
F36Beta.
The screen was blank (black) with only a cursor in the display.
So, I could find no way to resume my session. Have others seen this
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/48 (x86_64)
ID: 1206636 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1206636
ID: 1206657 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220330.n.0):
ID: 1205838 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1205838
ID: 1205919 Test:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220326.0):
ID: 1206605 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1206605
ID: 1206627 Test:
Hi folks! Trying something a bit new here. I've nominated today's
Fedora 36 nightly compose for validation testing. We do this regularly
in any case, but I'm sending this out to a wider group and asking folks
to treat this nightly as it it were a release candidate, and try to
complete the *full*
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/231 (x86_64), 27/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
The fixed version (4.16.0-7) of samba is in koji right now and I've
confirmed it fixes the problem, or you can just downgrade.
The sole version with the bug is 4.16.0-6
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:53 AM Roger Grosswiler wrote:
>
> Thx Chris,
>
> So waiting for the patch which seems to work.
>
>
Thx Chris,
So waiting for the patch which seems to work.
Roger
Am 01.04.22 um 19:46 schrieb Chris Murphy:
Bug is in samba.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068976
--
Chris
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Bug is in samba.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068976
--
Chris
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
F36 Final freeze begins Tuesday 5 April. We are currently targeting
the early target date (2022-04-19), which means we'd want to have
blockers fixed by 11 April in order to provide time for validation
testing prior to the Go/No-go meeting on 14 April.
Action summary
Accepted
On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 13:03 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:36 AM Roger Grosswiler
> wrote:
>
> > Well, not that easy on a screenshot, but i do my best :)
> >
> > "Access to place not possible - Mount of the windows share is unsucessful:
> > the argument is invalid"
> >
>
OLD: Fedora-36-20220330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220401.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 164
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 556.73 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:36 AM Roger Grosswiler
wrote:
> Well, not that easy on a screenshot, but i do my best :)
>
> "Access to place not possible - Mount of the windows share is unsucessful:
> the argument is invalid"
>
Thanks. Can anyone with some smb shares try it, please?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:00 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> @Chris, I've removed the weak dependency on ipp-usb in cups[1] and
> sane-airscan[2], can you/I remove
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066528 from final blocker
> proposals now?
>
We should probably remove the blocker
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220331.0):
ID: 1205298 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 4/1/22 11:21, Alexander Pevzner wrote:
Hi Zdenek,
is there any way for me to read this discussion from the very beginning?
Hi Alex,
thanks for looking into this! This will be little difficult:
Here is the initial message:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220331.0):
ID: 1205282 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1205282
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
...or even better:
On 01/04/2022 10:29, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:39 AM Roger Grosswiler
wrote:
Hello,
Since upgrade to F36-Beta, its no longer possible to mount
SMB-Share by Nautilus.
Connecting to the server works fine, but after clicking on a share
Well, not that easy on a screenshot, but i do my best :)
"Access to place not possible - Mount of the windows share is
unsucessful: the argument is invalid"
Am 01.04.22 um 10:29 schrieb Kamil Paral:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:39 AM Roger Grosswiler
wrote:
Hello,
Since upgrade to
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:14 AM Antonio Dias wrote:
> I'm trying to download torrents using Fragments, but it is core-dumping
> with the following error:
>
> [2022-03-31 19:05:44.531] tr_crypto_utils: OpenSSL error:
> error:0308010C:digital envelope routines::unsupported
> assertion failed:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:39 AM Roger Grosswiler
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since upgrade to F36-Beta, its no longer possible to mount SMB-Share by
> Nautilus.
>
> Connecting to the server works fine, but after clicking on a share to get
> it mounted in Nautilus, the following error occurs (sorry,
On 3/31/22 17:59, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yeah fair point. I think the ick factor is the main reason why I'm
thinking something really needs to be done to make it better. But
unfortunately I'm not really thinking of a great way to handle this
other than Common Bugs. Maybe with Common Bugs now
Hello,
Since upgrade to F36-Beta, its no longer possible to mount SMB-Share by
Nautilus.
Connecting to the server works fine, but after clicking on a share to
get it mounted in Nautilus, the following error occurs (sorry, german only):
I tried with FQDN, Hostname, IP, changed hostname in
25 matches
Mail list logo
