On 4/25/23 06:43, Nils Smeds wrote:
This makes kernel updates break for any user who needs the headers (for example
to build 3rd party kernel modules [NVidia])
The kernel headers package is not updated for every kernel release
because that's not necessary. Have you tried it? Is compiling
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 12:20 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:18 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:18 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a
> > > blocker then?
> > >
> >
> > For popular
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a
> > blocker then?
> >
>
> For popular third-party software, I think this testing occurs quite
> naturally -
This is FC38
[nsmeds-x1(nsmeds):~] sudo dnf list --available kernel-headers kernel
[sudo] password for nsmeds:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Tue 25 Apr 2023 15:33:40 CEST.
Available Packages
kernel.x86_64 6.2.12-300.fc38
This makes kernel updates break for any user who needs the headers (for example
to build 3rd party kernel modules [NVidia])
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a
> blocker then?
>
For popular third-party software, I think this testing occurs quite
naturally - people just use it. E.g. Steam, Chrome, VSCode, etc. I've been
running
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 09:52 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 14:59, AV via test
> wrote:
> > Blocked executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date:
> > /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shimx64-fedora.efi Authenticode checksum
> >
Yes this wasn't very well considered. I'll adjust that behavior upstream, and
apply an interim patch to rawhide
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 14:59, AV via test wrote:
> Blocked executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date:
> /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shimx64-fedora.efi Authenticode checksum
> [0ce02100f67c7ef85f4eed368f02bf7092380a3c23ca91fd7f19430d94b00c19] is
> present in dbx
Where did you get
10 matches
Mail list logo